Gmail error

This is a discussion on Gmail error within the General Discussions forums, part of the Community Boards category; Anyone else getting an error message when accessing your gmail account since the last Firefox update? Error Some Gmail features ...

  1. #1
    (?<!re)tired Mario F.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    7,403

    Gmail error

    Anyone else getting an error message when accessing your gmail account since the last Firefox update?

    Error
    Some Gmail features have failed to load. If this problem persists, try reloading the page, using the older version, or using basic HTML mode. Learn More.
    I get this every time I access through HTTPS. But not when going through HTTP.
    Last edited by Mario F.; 08-01-2009 at 05:51 PM.
    The programmer’s wife tells him: “Run to the store and pick up a loaf of bread. If they have eggs, get a dozen.”
    The programmer comes home with 12 loaves of bread.


    Originally Posted by brewbuck:
    Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.

  2. #2
    Devil's Advocate SlyMaelstrom's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Out of scope
    Posts
    4,066
    Quote Originally Posted by Mario F. View Post
    Anyone else getting an error message when accessing your gmail account since the last Firefox update?



    I get this every time I access through HTTPS. But not when going through HTTP.
    Yes, I've been getting that fairly consistently in Firefox for a while, now. Unfortunately, for me it's not as simple as the protocol... seems fairly random.
    Sent from my iPad®

  3. #3
    & the hat of GPL slaying Thantos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    5,681
    Get a better browser

  4. #4
    Malum in se abachler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    3,189
    Quote Originally Posted by Thantos View Post
    Get a better browser
    Like Chrome or IE
    Until you can build a working general purpose reprogrammable computer out of basic components from radio shack, you are not fit to call yourself a programmer in my presence. This is cwhizard, signing off.

  5. #5
    Webhead Spidey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    285
    Quote Originally Posted by abachler View Post
    Like Chrome or IE
    IMO, Chrome > Firefox > IE
    Spidey out!

  6. #6
    (?<!re)tired Mario F.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    7,403
    Quote Originally Posted by Spidey View Post
    IMO, Chrome > Firefox > IE
    Yeah well, that gives me a compile error.

    If you folks don't mind, when a real browser doesn't work, I switch to another real browser. Using Opera. I think that's more in line with what Thantos was suggesting.
    The programmer’s wife tells him: “Run to the store and pick up a loaf of bread. If they have eggs, get a dozen.”
    The programmer comes home with 12 loaves of bread.


    Originally Posted by brewbuck:
    Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.

  7. #7
    Unregistered User Yarin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,591
    Quote Originally Posted by Mario F. View Post
    If you folks don't mind, when a real browser doesn't work, I switch to another real browser. Using Opera.
    My sentiments exactly. Chrome has some growing up to do.
    A class that doesn't overload all operators just isn't finished yet. -- SmugCeePlusPlusWeenie
    A year spent in artificial intelligence is enough to make one believe in God. -- Alan J. Perlis

  8. #8
    Malum in se abachler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    3,189
    Quote Originally Posted by Yarin View Post
    My sentiments exactly. Chrome has some growing up to do.
    No it doesn't. chrome is intended to be a light weight browser, not a full featured browser. Its for people that just need to browse, not run web enabled applications, although it can do that as well. I find that it loads web pages much faster than IE or FF, so I use it for 95% of my browsing. The other 5% is just govt sites that don't support chrome officially, and pop up a screen saying so, even though you can skip the screen and it works fine, I just open them in IE so i don't have to go through that extra step.
    Until you can build a working general purpose reprogrammable computer out of basic components from radio shack, you are not fit to call yourself a programmer in my presence. This is cwhizard, signing off.

  9. #9
    C++まいる!Cをこわせ! Elysia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    22,411
    Gah, will this turn into a browser war thread? Let everyone use the browser they want.
    As for the error, I don't get it, but that error tends to rear its ugly head now and then, at random times, but always goes away some time later.
    Quote Originally Posted by Adak View Post
    io.h certainly IS included in some modern compilers. It is no longer part of the standard for C, but it is nevertheless, included in the very latest Pelles C versions.
    Quote Originally Posted by Salem View Post
    You mean it's included as a crutch to help ancient programmers limp along without them having to relearn too much.

    Outside of your DOS world, your header file is meaningless.

  10. #10
    & the hat of GPL slaying Thantos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    5,681
    Quote Originally Posted by Mario F. View Post
    Yeah well, that gives me a compile error.

    If you folks don't mind, when a real browser doesn't work, I switch to another real browser. Using Opera. I think that's more in line with what Thantos was suggesting.
    I use chrome on my windows box and I love it. I, personally, don't need a lot of extra in my browser. I tried using a dev version of chrome on my mac box but it didn't seem to run that well. Will have to try again after the mac port gets further along.

  11. #11
    (?<!re)tired Mario F.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    7,403
    My one and only annoyance with opera is the lack of a nice gmail notifier. Or one that works for me. It forces me to use a google's own email notifier which I'd rather not since I prefer to keep my taskbar with only the essentials.

    As for Chrome, just doesn't work for me. I like my browser to be fully featured and include such things as content block, fine tuned control over javascript and flash, ability to store notes, and other niceties. Meanwhile kudos on Chrome for being fast. But I really don't give a rat's arse if my webpages takes 0.17 more seconds to launch.
    The programmer’s wife tells him: “Run to the store and pick up a loaf of bread. If they have eggs, get a dozen.”
    The programmer comes home with 12 loaves of bread.


    Originally Posted by brewbuck:
    Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.

  12. #12
    C++まいる!Cをこわせ! Elysia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    22,411
    Quote Originally Posted by Mario F. View Post
    My one and only annoyance with opera is the lack of a nice gmail notifier. Or one that works for me. It forces me to use a google's own email notifier which I'd rather not since I prefer to keep my taskbar with only the essentials.
    Doesn't it hide in the systray, though?
    If you are worried about that, then you will be pleased to know that Win7 offers a feature to hide and shut up chosen icons in the systray. Nice feature if I may say so.
    Quote Originally Posted by Adak View Post
    io.h certainly IS included in some modern compilers. It is no longer part of the standard for C, but it is nevertheless, included in the very latest Pelles C versions.
    Quote Originally Posted by Salem View Post
    You mean it's included as a crutch to help ancient programmers limp along without them having to relearn too much.

    Outside of your DOS world, your header file is meaningless.

  13. #13
    (?<!re)tired Mario F.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    7,403
    Yeah. I meant system tray, not taskbar.
    The programmer’s wife tells him: “Run to the store and pick up a loaf of bread. If they have eggs, get a dozen.”
    The programmer comes home with 12 loaves of bread.


    Originally Posted by brewbuck:
    Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.

  14. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    11
    I thought I'd throw a crazy idea out there, why not use a mail client instead of a web browser to check your email.

  15. #15
    The Registered User Aparavoid's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    74
    Quote Originally Posted by misterdanny View Post
    I thought I'd throw a crazy idea out there, why not use a mail client instead of a web browser to check your email.
    Too much learning overhead for me. Btw Epiphany is a good underrated browser. Definitly worth checking out.

Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. Getting an error with OpenGL: collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
    By Lorgon Jortle in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-08-2009, 08:18 PM
  2. An error is driving me nuts!
    By ulillillia in forum C Programming
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-04-2009, 09:15 PM
  3. Making C DLL using MSVC++ 2005
    By chico1st in forum C Programming
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 05-28-2008, 01:17 PM
  4. Connecting to a mysql server and querying problem
    By Diod in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-13-2006, 09:33 AM
  5. Couple C questions :)
    By Divx in forum C Programming
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-28-2003, 12:10 AM

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21