Visit from Bjarne Stroustroup

Tonto · 10-30-2008, 09:00 AM

My school as a part of a distinguished lecture series presentation had bjarne stroustroup come to speak about c++0x. I've been largely aloof from programming but I was really excited for this. He came and talked to us about the new features and the bureaucracy of the commitee. It was definitely inspiring.

I love the new features -- auto types and concepts are impressive to me, and I know even on this board I've talked about variadic templates and local template arguments before I knew of the planned improvements..I'm hyped on the new features. What do you guys think of the new deal?

Elysia · 10-30-2008, 10:51 AM

Myself, I cannot wait for C++0x!
It features so many new wonderful features.
I can only hope someone implements them soon.

abachler · 10-30-2008, 12:47 PM

Forgive me, but I personally don't use templates very much, or really at all. I would be much more impressed with the addition of other features such as auto-expanded type support. The specification already defines 128 bit integers and floats, yet most compilers dont support them. It would be realatively trivial to support the automatic generation of code to support these larger types through software at least until they are supprted by hardware. For example, if I declared float128, the compiler should automatically generate code to handle a 128 bit float. But it should also handle float1024, float65536 etc. through the same feature. There is already hardware that supports 128 bit floating point (GPU's). This woudl ensure support for new hardware capabilities as they become available. This is of course something that would only benefit a small segment of the programming population, but then again, templates also only benefit a small segment of the population.

Elysia · 10-30-2008, 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by abachler

...but then again, templates also only benefit a small segment of the population.

Forgive me, but I find templates pretty much everywhere and very, very convenient. I think it is one of the most important features of C++.
Although, I would not mind standardized types that are of exact sizes such as int64, etc, and 128-bit types would not hurt either.

**laserlight** · 10-30-2008, 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elysia

Forgive me, but I find templates pretty much everywhere and very, very convenient. I think it is one of the most important features of C++.

Yes, but abachler does have a point in that advanced template programmers are a minority, even though their work benefits the majority.

Elysia · 10-30-2008, 01:00 PM

Oh. Well, templates is one of the features I heavily depend upon, so improvements there are very welcomed by me.

whiteflags · 10-30-2008, 01:04 PM

>> Although, I would not mind standardized types that are of exact sizes such as int64,
Well we get some of that in C++0x or so I've heard. stdint will finally be supported for C++ by the standard. As far as 128 bit floats, I don't think there is a problem in doing it so much as the standard nor its implementers should make an assumption on the part of the programmer. For example, you could dedicate sign bits, 62 bits to an exponent and the rest to the mantissa, but the programmer might want a longer mantissa (greater precision). Even if the standard didn't mandate the particulars (range requirements) I don't think it solves many problems that could arise in implementation of automatic type expansion.

**CornedBee** · 10-30-2008, 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by abachler

but then again, templates also only benefit a small segment of the population.

Wrong. For example, you could use templates to implement

Code:

template<int bits>
class floating {... };

and, with good specializations and good underlying libraries, get exactly what you're proposing.

Code:

floating<32> f32; // Maps to float
floating<64> f64; // Maps to double
floating<80> f80; // Maps to 80-bit long double, if available, or perhaps a truncating 128-bit long double
floating<128> f128; // Maps to 128-bit long double, if available, or perhaps SSE intrinsics
floating<1024> f1024; // Software emulation

Of course, you could also have

Code:

template <int mantissa_bits, int exponent_bits, bool denormals, bool signaling> class floating;

But of course you need very special hardware if you don't want most of these to be emulated.

Yes, it's work. But the great thing about templates is that it makes this stuff possible.

pheres · 11-10-2008, 06:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CornedBee

Wrong. For example, you could use templates to implement

Code:

template<int bits>
class floating {... };

Does that have any other advantages against

Code:

class floating(int bits){...};

but the one what it saves the floating-ctor from selecting the needed implementation?

Akkernight · 11-10-2008, 06:48 AM

Is a new C coming? :O
Is it then wise to learn C++, now that I'm at such a low stage, or should I wait for C++0x?

maxorator · 11-10-2008, 07:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Akkernight

Is a new C coming? :O
Is it then wise to learn C++, now that I'm at such a low stage, or should I wait for C++0x?

I wouldn't switch to a language that has been available for less than 5 years. I have a strange feeling this language will not be widely used in the near future. I think it will share the destiny with A++, B++, D++, E++ etc.

**sean** · 11-10-2008, 08:10 AM

Furthermore - you've always got the universal response for any question on which language to learn:

The concepts are the same - learn to program well in one language, and you will be more prepared to program well in another language. I would keep learning C++ now and make the decision to learn C++0x later.

Elysia · 11-10-2008, 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pheres

Does that have any other advantages against

Code:

class floating(int bits){...};

but the one what it saves the floating-ctor from selecting the needed implementation?

Yes.
1) It's a compile-time constant.
2) It doesn't use memory.
3) It doesn't take cpu time to copy and fetch.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Akkernight

Is a new C coming? :O
Is it then wise to learn C++, now that I'm at such a low stage, or should I wait for C++0x?

No need to wait for C++0x. It adds new features to the C++ language, so you still need the base. Go forth and master that which already is!

Quote:

Originally Posted by maxorator

I wouldn't switch to a language that has been available for less than 5 years. I have a strange feeling this language will not be widely used in the near future. I think it will share the destiny with A++, B++, D++, E++ etc.

You think that C++ will fall into obscurity?

Yarin · 11-10-2008, 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elysia

Forgive me, but I find templates pretty much everywhere and very, very convenient. I think it is one of the most important features of C++.

I also don't hardley use templates, it's just that everytime I need to use them there's always another way of doing it. Far from the most important feature.

Quote:

Originally Posted by maxorator

I wouldn't switch to a language that has been available for less than 5 years. I have a strange feeling this language will not be widely used in the near future. I think it will share the destiny with A++, B++, D++, E++ etc.

It's too early to say, I mean, how many C programmers do you think said the same thing about C++ when it first came out?

**CornedBee** · 11-10-2008, 04:09 PM

C++0x is not a new language. It's just an evolution of C++03.

10-30-2008, 09:00 AM	#1
Tonto Registered User Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: New York Posts: 1,465	Visit from Bjarne Stroustroup My school as a part of a distinguished lecture series presentation had bjarne stroustroup come to speak about c++0x. I've been largely aloof from programming but I was really excited for this. He came and talked to us about the new features and the bureaucracy of the commitee. It was definitely inspiring. I love the new features -- auto types and concepts are impressive to me, and I know even on this board I've talked about variadic templates and local template arguments before I knew of the planned improvements..I'm hyped on the new features. What do you guys think of the new deal? __________________ ╔╗╔╦══╦╗╔╦══╦╗ ║╚╝║╔╗║╚╝║╔╗║║ ║╔╗║╠╣║╔╗║╠╣╠╣ ╚╝╚╩╝╚╩╝╚╩╝╚╩╝ codez http://code.google.com/p/zxcvbn/
Tonto is offline

10-30-2008, 12:47 PM	#3
abachler Malum in se Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 3,188	Forgive me, but I personally don't use templates very much, or really at all. I would be much more impressed with the addition of other features such as auto-expanded type support. The specification already defines 128 bit integers and floats, yet most compilers dont support them. It would be realatively trivial to support the automatic generation of code to support these larger types through software at least until they are supprted by hardware. For example, if I declared float128, the compiler should automatically generate code to handle a 128 bit float. But it should also handle float1024, float65536 etc. through the same feature. There is already hardware that supports 128 bit floating point (GPU's). This woudl ensure support for new hardware capabilities as they become available. This is of course something that would only benefit a small segment of the programming population, but then again, templates also only benefit a small segment of the population. __________________ Until you can build a working general purpose reprogrammable computer out of basic components from radio shack, you are not fit to call yourself a programmer in my presence. This is cwhizard, signing off.
abachler is offline

10-30-2008, 01:04 PM	#7
whiteflags MENTAL DETECTOR Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: United States Posts: 3,295	>> Although, I would not mind standardized types that are of exact sizes such as int64, Well we get some of that in C++0x or so I've heard. stdint will finally be supported for C++ by the standard. As far as 128 bit floats, I don't think there is a problem in doing it so much as the standard nor its implementers should make an assumption on the part of the programmer. For example, you could dedicate sign bits, 62 bits to an exponent and the rest to the mantissa, but the programmer might want a longer mantissa (greater precision). Even if the standard didn't mandate the particulars (range requirements) I don't think it solves many problems that could arise in implementation of automatic type expansion. __________________ <Niggawatts> Writing is both mechanical and organic <Niggawatts> It's like a cyborg dragon. <Niggawatts> Writing is like a cyborg dragon.
whiteflags is offline

11-10-2008, 06:48 AM	#10
Akkernight Hail to the king, baby. Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Faroe Islands Posts: 718	Is a new C coming? :O Is it then wise to learn C++, now that I'm at such a low stage, or should I wait for C++0x? __________________ Currently research OpenGL
Akkernight is offline

11-10-2008, 08:10 AM	#12
sean Super Moderator Join Date: Sep 2001 Posts: 4,746	Furthermore - you've always got the universal response for any question on which language to learn: The concepts are the same - learn to program well in one language, and you will be more prepared to program well in another language. I would keep learning C++ now and make the decision to learn C++0x later.
sean is offline

11-10-2008, 04:09 PM	#15
CornedBee Cat without Hat Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 8,492	C++0x is not a new language. It's just an evolution of C++03. __________________ All the buzzt! CornedBee "There is not now, nor has there ever been, nor will there ever be, any programming language in which it is the least bit difficult to write bad code." - Flon's Law
CornedBee is offline

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
FunctionType visit and binary search trees	MRAB54	C++ Programming	1	05-11-2004 05:20 AM
Request for comments	Prelude	A Brief History of Cprogramming.com	15	01-02-2004 10:33 AM
Interview with Bjarne Stroustrup "C++ a joke"	novacain	A Brief History of Cprogramming.com	4	03-31-2003 11:55 PM
Bjarne Stoustrup	ygfperson	A Brief History of Cprogramming.com	8	09-05-2002 06:22 PM