![]() |
| | #1 |
| Registered User Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Hermosa Beach, CA
Posts: 446
| .NET Frameowork 1.1 vs. 2.0
__________________ The crows maintain that a single crow could destroy the heavens. Doubtless this is so. But it proves nothing against the heavens, for the heavens signify simply: the impossibility of crows. |
| IfYouSaySo is offline | |
| | #2 |
| Anti-Poster Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,241
| http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/t357fb32.aspx For what's new in C#, you could also read http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/7cz8t42e.aspx.
__________________ Rule #1: Every rule has exceptions |
| pianorain is offline | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| migrate from .Net 2.0 to .Net 3.0 | George2 | C# Programming | 3 | 07-25-2007 04:07 AM |
| How bad is having in one PC: .NET 1.0, 1.1 and 2.0 | Joelito | C# Programming | 3 | 08-31-2006 12:25 PM |
| Compile to 1.1 got 2.0 | Coder87C | Windows Programming | 0 | 04-19-2006 03:13 AM |
| making a dll in .net 2.0 and than using it in .net 1.1 | Rune Hunter | C# Programming | 2 | 04-19-2005 01:59 PM |
| Visual J# | mfc2themax | A Brief History of Cprogramming.com | 0 | 10-08-2001 02:41 PM |