Yes beacause it automaticly returns EXIT_SUCCESS
Although I own code::blocks and Dev, I prefer dev when doing small programs, I dont have
to create a new project it my program will contain only the one file
Yes beacause it automaticly returns EXIT_SUCCESS
Although I own code::blocks and Dev, I prefer dev when doing small programs, I dont have
to create a new project it my program will contain only the one file
Double Helix STL
Dev broke on me and no longer functioned, so now I use Code::Blocks for projects and g++ and nano under cygwin for those I don't want to create a project for.
fair comment. Not sure how much longer il use dev, iv had it since version 8.0
Double Helix STL
Despite any possible comments, dev is still a good tool. I have it installed and use it for:
. Building open source distributions
. Answers on these forums
. Separate compilation to test snippets of code of my current project
. One file compilations
It's always up and running along with SlickEdit. It's very light on my system, quick to use, and makes for an excellent support tool.
Originally Posted by brewbuck:
Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.
Hence why it is still raved about, and will be for a while. Bloodshed should be proud
Double Helix STL
