member functions can't see private data members

Hi all,

I know this is something obvious, but I need another pair of eyes to look at it and tell me what I'm doing. I have some class methods declared like this:

Code:

#include "aspect.h" //defines Aspect
#include <map>
#include <string>

namespace sge {
    typdef std::map<std::string, Aspect*> StringAspectMap;

    class Object  {
    private:
        StringAspectMap aspectDict;
    public:
        void initAspects();
        void updateAspects(float dtime);
        void destroyAspects();
    };
}

Then over in my cpp I'm implementing them like this:

Code:

#include "object.h"
using namespace sge;

void Object::initAspects() {
    for (StringAspectMap::iterator itr = aspectDict.begin(); itr != apsectDict.end(); ++itr)
        itr->second->init();
}

void Object::updateAspects(float dtime) {
    for (StringAspectMap::iterator itr = aspectDict.begin(); itr != apsectDict.end(); ++itr)
        itr->second->update(dtime);
}

void Object::destroyAspects() {
    for (StringAspectMap::iterator itr = aspectDict.begin(); itr != apsectDict.end(); ++itr)
        itr->second->destroy();
}

Now when I compile this, I get:

../code/src/object.cpp: In member function ‘void sge::Object::initAspects()’:
../code/src/object.cpp:183: error: ‘apsectDict’ was not declared in this scope
../code/src/object.cpp: In member function ‘void sge::Object::updateAspects(float)’:
../code/src/object.cpp:188: error: ‘apsectDict’ was not declared in this scope
../code/src/object.cpp: In member function ‘void sge::Object::destroyAspects()’:
../code/src/object.cpp:193: error: ‘apsectDict’ was not declared in this scope

This doesn't make any sense to me. I'm in the right namespace, in the right class, implementing functions that I know I prototyped, but they can't see my private data. Can anyone see what I'm doing wrong?

I'm so stupid. aspect, not apsect. And I've been seriously sitting here for an hour trying to figure out what I'm doing wrong. Once again proving that the best help is to write a question about your problem.

It's also the power of copy-paste. It would have been much easier to catch if it only appeared in one function... It's a hate-love relationship the one I have with copy-paste.