... and I don't care if my students have to go to P2P networks to get a commercial compiler.
Yeah... Anyways, sorry for the off-topic post. I should have refrained myself considering I knew beforehand tis was mostly a rethorical question.
... and I don't care if my students have to go to P2P networks to get a commercial compiler.
Yeah... Anyways, sorry for the off-topic post. I should have refrained myself considering I knew beforehand tis was mostly a rethorical question.
Originally Posted by brewbuck:
Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.
>Yeah, I'm not stupid...
That's debatable.
>The one I have doesn't work properly and some parts don't work at all.
I doubt that. More likely is that you're expecting Borland conio functions to work with Microsoft libraries, and because the contents of conio.h vary wildly, it doesn't work. That's your problem for relying on compiler specific functions. You'll also get no sympathy as the FAQ for this forum tells you what the problem is and how to solve it using conio.h as an example.
My best code is written with the delete key.
