Hmm, I didn't know that. I thought it was C99 only, and said so in an earlier post.I don't know the details, but I think I've read that long long int will be part of the new standard.
[edit]
Yup, uint32_t etc are part of C99, in stdint.h: http://www.azillionmonkeys.com/qed/pstdint.h
[/edit]
dwk
Seek and ye shall find. quaere et invenies.
"Simplicity does not precede complexity, but follows it." -- Alan Perlis
"Testing can only prove the presence of bugs, not their absence." -- Edsger Dijkstra
"The only real mistake is the one from which we learn nothing." -- John Powell
Other boards: DaniWeb, TPS
Unofficial Wiki FAQ: cpwiki.sf.net
My website: http://dwks.theprogrammingsite.com/
Projects: codeform, xuni, atlantis, nort, etc.
i think instead of coding
Code:while( i > 45456456456456 || i < 454545454545)
you can write i < unsigned short or what ever
> Yup, uint32_t etc are part of C99, in stdint.h: http://www.azillionmonkeys.com/qed/pstdint.h
hmm... C99 "new types" (they aren't actually new types. They are simply tepedefs) are specified in inttypes.h.
Originally Posted by brewbuck:
Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.
Is that right? I was almost certain they were in stdint.h . . . .
Hussain Hani, are you referring to the fact that you can use the INT_MAX etc constants?
dwk
Seek and ye shall find. quaere et invenies.
"Simplicity does not precede complexity, but follows it." -- Alan Perlis
"Testing can only prove the presence of bugs, not their absence." -- Edsger Dijkstra
"The only real mistake is the one from which we learn nothing." -- John Powell
Other boards: DaniWeb, TPS
Unofficial Wiki FAQ: cpwiki.sf.net
My website: http://dwks.theprogrammingsite.com/
Projects: codeform, xuni, atlantis, nort, etc.
> Is that right? I was almost certain they were in stdint.h . . . .
I'm almost positive. Not absolutely sure. But will check...
EDIT: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg...onaleV5.10.pdf
See 7.8 and then check 7.18
Last edited by Mario F.; 09-27-2006 at 01:12 PM.
Originally Posted by brewbuck:
Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.
