I have an item class:
Of course there are other variables and functions, but that is besides the point. When I try to compile, I get an unresolved external error. I know I defined it, and the class I'm passing in has everything required.Code:class Citem { public: Citem(){}//for briefness, this isn't my exact code template<class Target> bool Use(Target &target); };
What I did notice is when I hit class view (MSVC++), the Use function wasn't there! Help!
Stan The Man. Beatles fan
When I was a child,
I spoke as a child,
I thought as a child,
I reasoned as a child.
When I became a man,
I put childish ways behind me"
(the holy bible, Paul, in his first letter to the Cor. 13:11)
Try inlining the templated class function definition. I know that at least under some conditions MSVC doesn't support definition of templated methods outside of the class declaration.
Very few (if any) C++ compilers will allow you to put template declarations and definitions in different files. It is much more portable just to put the definition where the declaration is (perhaps at the bottom of the file, but still in the same file).
The word rap as it applies to music is the result of a peculiar phonological rule which has stripped the word of its initial voiceless velar stop.
In my experience the template class can be in a header but most of its function members must also be defined in the header. Sort of like being a newbie to C and putting all functions and code in the header. I, too, have generated several errors in trying to do what you are. I'm not sure why this is - perhaps its because of late binding and the fact that the compiler does not know the type at compile time. Template classes can be a major headache...I think I had to even put the constructor code in the header or it gave me some kind of 'cannot find default constructor' error.
It's been awhile since I've messed with templates. At one time I thought they were the coolest thing...but they can be a major pain in the rump and generate some weird errors for simple problems.
You'll sit there and look at the MSVC errors scratching your head and yelling at the compiler.
By the way is it just me or are the MSVC errors bass ackwards. Borland has much better error messages.
