Thread: UML to code polymorphism

I have this code generated UML. Now, I like him because of you want to check. Did the idea that he does not quite right ... Because this is my first time I'm going with polymorphism.

UML: Attachment 12640

Code:

#include <cstdlib>
#include <iostream>
#include <string>


using namespace std;


class DrawObject{}


class Rectangle : public DrawObject{
      private: 
               Point leftBottom;
      private: 
               int length, width;
      public:
             Rectangle( int length, int width)
             : length(length), width(width){
                               };
                               void draw() const;
      }
      
class Triangle : public DrawObject{
      private: 
               Point pA, pB, pC;
      public:
            {
             };
                               void draw() const;
      }
      
class Circle : public DrawObject{
      private: 
               Point center;
      private:
              int radius;
      public:
             Circle( int radius)
             : radius(radius){
                               };
                               void draw() const;  
      }


class Oval : public DrawObject{
      private: 
               Point center;
      private:
              int xRadius, yRadius;
      public:
            {
             };
                               void draw() const;
      }


typedef struct {
  int xPos;
  int yPos;
} Point;








int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
    system("PAUSE");
    return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}

Perhaps you should try again, because there is no attachment.

Inheritance is represented with generalization links in UML (Open arrows). Realization links (Closed triangle arrows) are used to represent inheritance from an interface. Polymorphism can be represented using these. If the code generator is fairly decent it will use inheritance when your UML uses it and if it is an interface it will be a pure abstract class. Most UML tools allow you to specify the inheritance type in the properties of the object and this should be reflected in the generated code.

On a side note code generated from UML tools is usually awful and I would not recommend it even as a starting point. I have never had good luck with it in Enterprise Architect or Visio. I do not have experience with Rational Rose so I cannot comment on it.