Not as far as I'm concerned. I just think that a function is a better place to put all the functionality.So, I am to understand the following changes:
Not as far as I'm concerned. I just think that a function is a better place to put all the functionality.So, I am to understand the following changes:
All the buzzt!
CornedBee
"There is not now, nor has there ever been, nor will there ever be, any programming language in which it is the least bit difficult to write bad code."
- Flon's Law
But functions do not have the flexibility of classes... No possibility of overriding the conversion part, for example.
Originally Posted by Adak
*shrug*
That sounds more like feature creep than something you actually need to me.
All the buzzt!
"There is not now, nor has there ever been, nor will there ever be, any programming language in which it is the least bit difficult to write bad code."
- Flon's Law
Yes, but then again, I like flexibility. If you wanted to change the conversion part, I'd have to break it out into its own function which you could specialize, in order to avoid re-coding everything else... and you have to specialize it for every type you want it to do differently.
I still think I'm going for a class, but taking into account what everyone thinks...
