Originally Posted by
phantomotap
>_<
I don't know if this is a waste of time or not, but I am trying to be polite. Well, at least in this particular post...
I'm not ignoring the discussion whoie. I really did type a rather lengthy, and hopefully understandable, post and followed by a C macro example.
Unfortunately, I was also downloading an ISO and my browser crashed.
So... yea... not typing it all in again, but the short story: the designated initializers as provided by C99 fit to small a niche compared to what C++ provides by implicit partial construction and implicit destruction.
Soma *grumble*