Thread: Virtual Table

It can get very complex with multiple, virtual and non-virtual inheritance.

Originally Posted by C-RaT

if you have some junk to flood here in this space then probably some crap chat machine can quench your thirst for that.
...
Its no intelligent to ask a question over the asked question.
...
you sould be thinking a bit before answering to this.

You're not exactly making friends with those kind of comments. We'll always be happy to help and answer your question (which I believe we did), but we won't do someone's homework for them and, unfortunately, that's what your question sounded like.

QuantumPete

Not to mention that it's been answered:
In any existing known compiler there is ONE vtable.

Originally Posted by Cornedbee

Anyway, there's no compiler that creates more than one vtable for any given class.

An entirely different question is how many vptrs F will contain.

--
Mats

Originally Posted by C-RaT

Its no intelligent to ask a question over the asked question.

Pure insolence. It's amazing how many general forum ettiquite guidelines you've broken in just a single post.

If you had asked what is the diameter of a ball, then you're suggesting that people should not ask whether it is a golf-ball, tennis-ball, or basket-ball etc. Fine then, the answer is 42!

Originally Posted by C-RaT

....do we have to really waste our time for that?

expecting people to be generous enough to share if they know something, guess thats why such forums are made.

...

Anyway if any one has some clear picture about the question then is invited to share it.
and please if you have some junk to flood here in this space then probably some crap chat machine can quench your thirst for that.

Its no intelligent to ask a question over the asked question.
Hope all of you have worked with virtual functions and virtual classes and was genuin replies from your end.

Its would have been so great of all of you if you could have atleast given the answer considering the way you use it so we could have had knowledge of different kind of implementations we were talking about all the while.

Those are quite rude comments.
Actually, I want to say it's you who asked a crap question. It's only fair.

any ways hope have no offended you and if at all i have then possibly you sould be thinking a bit before answering to this.

Laughable!
You come here, insult everyone and hope they will be nice to you?
And I will add something else: since this forum is about portability and standard compliance, answering your question is not done easily or SHOULD not be done by us, because it's IMPLEMENTATION DEPENDANT. Meaning every compiler does it differently, so you should NOT rely on it.
Now go away. Shoo.