Database Class.

This is a discussion on Database Class. within the C++ Programming forums, part of the General Programming Boards category; I wish C/C++ wasn't so strict....

  1. #16
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    141
    I wish C/C++ wasn't so strict.

  2. #17
    C++まいる!Cをこわせ! Elysia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    22,420
    4) works for me, though. Shrug.
    Well, actually, it doesn't always work. It only works when FF decides to cache the page.
    And it's a good thing C++ is so strict. It tells you you did something wrong.
    Last edited by Elysia; 08-04-2008 at 11:17 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Adak View Post
    io.h certainly IS included in some modern compilers. It is no longer part of the standard for C, but it is nevertheless, included in the very latest Pelles C versions.
    Quote Originally Posted by Salem View Post
    You mean it's included as a crutch to help ancient programmers limp along without them having to relearn too much.

    Outside of your DOS world, your header file is meaningless.

  3. #18
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    141
    Quote Originally Posted by Elysia View Post
    4) works for me, though. Shrug.
    Well, actually, it doesn't always work. It only works when FF decides to cache the page.
    And it's a good thing C++ is so strict. It tells you you did something wrong.
    I hate caches sometimes. xD They're good for rendering pages faster, but then sometimes those caches can have old data. Also, well I guess it's just me being a nooby, that's why xD

  4. #19
    C++まいる!Cをこわせ! Elysia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    22,420
    What is it you don't like about the strictness of C++, may I ask?
    Perhaps there's a solution...
    Quote Originally Posted by Adak View Post
    io.h certainly IS included in some modern compilers. It is no longer part of the standard for C, but it is nevertheless, included in the very latest Pelles C versions.
    Quote Originally Posted by Salem View Post
    You mean it's included as a crutch to help ancient programmers limp along without them having to relearn too much.

    Outside of your DOS world, your header file is meaningless.

  5. #20
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    141
    Quote Originally Posted by Elysia View Post
    What is it you don't like about the strictness of C++, may I ask?
    Perhaps there's a solution...
    It just seems the syntax is very.. open.. @_@
    Though I haven't even touched iterators yet besides the one laserlight gave.

    I don't know, it just seems like people are making up syntax aswell as they go on. I look at a lot of source code. :P

    Then theres pointers that act bizarre, like so:

    Code:
    **(*int)*(myhook)**(&(*myhook))
    By the way, I have a strange paranoia. I don't want to forget everything about the language, and then one day come to be like "oh ..........."
    Last edited by bobbelPoP; 08-04-2008 at 11:33 AM.

  6. #21
    C++まいる!Cをこわせ! Elysia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    22,420
    But I don't find that very related to strictness of the language...
    Quote Originally Posted by Adak View Post
    io.h certainly IS included in some modern compilers. It is no longer part of the standard for C, but it is nevertheless, included in the very latest Pelles C versions.
    Quote Originally Posted by Salem View Post
    You mean it's included as a crutch to help ancient programmers limp along without them having to relearn too much.

    Outside of your DOS world, your header file is meaningless.

  7. #22
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    141
    Quote Originally Posted by Elysia View Post
    But I don't find that very related to strictness of the language...
    Must be me.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-14-2009, 04:13 PM
  2. Friend class?
    By legit in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-25-2008, 11:32 AM
  3. matrix class
    By shuo in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-13-2007, 01:03 AM
  4. Screwy Linker Error - VC2005
    By Tonto in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-19-2007, 02:39 PM
  5. Abstract class problem
    By VanJay011379 in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-31-2002, 01:30 PM

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21