*shrug* When it comes to infinity you can prove alot of things that fly in the face of existing proofs. Just goes to show: Math is a religion, not a science.
This is a discussion on math problem...? within the C++ Programming forums, part of the General Programming Boards category; *shrug* When it comes to infinity you can prove alot of things that fly in the face of existing proofs. ...
*shrug* When it comes to infinity you can prove alot of things that fly in the face of existing proofs. Just goes to show: Math is a religion, not a science.
Type-ins are back! Visit Cymon's Games at http://www.cymonsgames.com for a new game every week!
I have yet to see a single counter proof for this.
If the proof contradicts another proof, then at least one of them must be wrong, and consequently not a proof.When it comes to infinity you can prove alot of things that fly in the face of existing proofs.
As mentioned in my private message, I am still curious to know if indeed you have met professional mathematicians that regard infinity as a number, and thus formally use the notation 10^(-infinity) instead of involving limits.
C + C++ Compiler: MinGW port of GCC
Version Control System: Bazaar
Look up a C++ Reference and learn How To Ask Questions The Smart Way
Sorry, there's no PM pop-up.
As for does anyone use the notation 10^(infiniate), no, but they express the idea verbally.
Type-ins are back! Visit Cymon's Games at http://www.cymonsgames.com for a new game every week!
But is 0 not the limit of 10^x as x tends to negative infinity? Like Thantos, I cannot see how this is any sort of proof that 0.999... is not equal to 1.As for does anyone use the notation 10^(infiniate), no, but they express the idea verbally.
C + C++ Compiler: MinGW port of GCC
Version Control System: Bazaar
Look up a C++ Reference and learn How To Ask Questions The Smart Way
*shrug* I never understood it myself, but these were folks who were professors in the field. There are many people convinced that infinity, or infinite decimal places, tends to break proofs.
By the way...
Your proof makes a little more sense if you explicitly state before the last step that the step before it means that 9x = 9 therefore x = 1.
Type-ins are back! Visit Cymon's Games at http://www.cymonsgames.com for a new game every week!