quick everyone...
$$$$$ FIGHT ! ! !
*and the crowd goes wild *
Next week we can write some code to check penis size... [ error checking ommitted of course, we dont want people knowing the truth]
quick everyone...
$$$$$ FIGHT ! ! !
*and the crowd goes wild *
Next week we can write some code to check penis size... [ error checking ommitted of course, we dont want people knowing the truth
@c99should beCode:printf("%s", buf)but you editted that outCode:printf("%s", buf);
@spudtheimpaler: Who the hell are you? Hammer just brought up a small error that he saw and instead of answering it outright he wanted people to think.
Hey i'm a good guy, was just sensing tensions were high. Wishing i'd used the preview button though, can see now my post seems that much more catty than it was intended. I read these posts looking to learn, so I'm more keen than most for that sort of error checking. I can't comment on the code cause my experience barely hits the months.
As i said, trying to lighten the mood ( though didn't go about it the right way )
Apologies to any offended, I like this place far too much to ........ anyone off
Mitch
Heh I'm sorry also. The "who the hell are you" was a little out of lineNo harm no foul right?
No harm no foul. All's well that ends well.
Wouldn't it be better to make nbytes a size_t?
Hey it's all good.
I'm still trying to navigate my way around this forum. I've yet
to work out how I can copy from and past to it.
I would never post code that didn't compile and run on my system
using gcc -Wall -pedantic -std=c99 (Occassionally I'll omit -std=c99)
As for you Edward, bite me, and Hammer, check the facts next
time you decide to side with a moron.
Actually it appears Hammer was siding with you on the condition that you meant not to do error checking.
Just FYI: Most of us assume people will be using a C89 standard compiler and not a c99 compiler. If you are doing something that is allowed in c99 but not in c89 you may wish to state that you are using a c99 so we don't jump on you for no reason.using gcc -Wall -pedantic -std=c99 (Occassionally I'll omit -std=c99)
Last edited by Thantos; 02-23-2004 at 04:58 PM.
You're far too sensitive. Perhaps you should go back and read my posts. You'll notice the presence of aAs for you Edward, bite me, and Hammer, check the facts next
time you decide to side with a moron.
Look again, it's there alright.Not in your snippet unless I'm going blind (that I wear glasses suggests that this could very well be the case).
No, I went to watch a filmCat got your tongue?
It's a case of me not reading every word in the thread. Oh well, my bad on that oneI could swear
the second line of my post says "note that error checking has
been omitted" or is this a case of selective blindness?
My facts are just fine thanks. And no need to get abusive towards people that highlight problems in your code, lighten up.and Hammer, check the facts next
time you decide to side with a moron.
When all else fails, read the instructions.
If you're posting code, use code tags: [code] /* insert code here */ [/code]
Ah! Is this what it's all about.
Well, well, well... What compiler are you using Turbo C?
Tell it to someone that cares.
Whatever!
Hammer.
"It's a case of me not reading every word in the thread"
Dude, I wrote two lines of text, what part did you read?
"Oh well, my bad on that one"
Yeah your bad!
"My facts are just fine thanks."
Uh! So you admit you didn't read the facts yet state your facts
are just fine? How can they be fine if you didn't read them?
And abusive? Now your delusional as well...
Hammer, If you're not going to read at least up to the second line
of a thread text, why bother even commenting on the thread.
Okay that being said I appreciate any comments on any thread
I make. I will however not be subjected to troll trash remarks
as were made initially by Edward.
You're clearly imagining things. I can't find anything that even remotely resembles "troll trash remarks" in my posts. Yours on the other hand have a few. I'm reporting this thread to be closed.I will however not be subjected to troll trash remarks
as were made initially by Edward.
Edward.
My first response to you was valid and correct unless, you, like
Hammer, also failed to read the very second line of my post.
Edward, you're a troll, that's not an insult, it's a fact!
Will someone please kill this thread.
It is the ruling of this court that you're a dick.Originally posted by c99
Edward.
My first response to you was valid and correct unless, you, like
Hammer, also failed to read the very second line of my post.
Edward, you're a troll, that's not an insult, it's a fact!
Will someone please kill this thread.
Thread closed.
-Govtcheez
[email protected]
