> and i would like to know one more thing.is there any difference between char* a and char *a?
Semantically, no.
But from a style point of view,
you have a better chance working out that b is a character, than you have of working out that d is a character.Code:char *a, b; char* c, d;
If you dance barefoot on the broken glass of undefined behaviour, you've got to expect the occasional cut.
If at first you don't succeed, try writing your phone number on the exam paper.
in the first case only a will be a pointer and in the second case both c and d will be a pointer.that's what it means.So there is no difference in its usage.only difference is while we declare.am i right?
> in the first case only a will be a pointer and in the second case both c and d will be a pointer.that's what it means.
Like I said, easier to figure out.
By the way, you're wrong.
a and c a pointers to char
b and d are just chars.
The position of the * is irrelevant.
If you dance barefoot on the broken glass of undefined behaviour, you've got to expect the occasional cut.
If at first you don't succeed, try writing your phone number on the exam paper.
ok.i got it now.
