Thread: Advice needed on correct usage of the pause() and alarm() functions...

Hi all,

I'm trying to write a program which will give two processes 5 seconds each to write their message to the screen.

The problem is that the pause function isn't unpausing when the second process emits it's SIGALRM...

Would somebody please be able to advise me on where I'm going wrong?

Please see my code below:

Code:

/*  */



// Pre-processor Directives /////////////////////////////////////

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <wait.h>
#include <signal.h>

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////



// Function Prototypes //////////////////////////////////////////

void handler( int );

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////



// Main Function Implementation /////////////////////////////////

int i = 1, j = 1;

int main( void )
{
	if( fork() != 0 )
	{
		while( 1 )
		{
			signal( SIGALRM, handler );
			if( i == 1 )
			{
				alarm( 5 );
				i--;
			}
			printf( "[PARENT] Serving HTTP Session 2\n" );fflush( stdout );
		}
	}
	else
	{
		sleep( 5 ); /* Allow the parent to get ready. */
		while( 1 )
		{
			signal( SIGALRM, handler );
			if( j == 1 )
			{
				alarm( 5 );
				j--;
			}
			printf( "[CHILD] Serving HTTP Session 1\n" );fflush( stdout );
		}
	}
	exit( EXIT_SUCCESS );
}

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////



// Sub-function Implementation //////////////////////////////////

void handler( int SIG )
{
	printf( "[HANDLER] Signal recieved!\n" );fflush( stdout );
	signal( SIG, handler );
	pause(); /* Pause the process until the other process sends it's alarm signal. */
	if( i == 0 )
		i++;
	if( j == 0 )
		j++;
}

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

first of all i think the logic of the first and second while loops is not the best the while(1) thing would not stop since its always true. don't you have a better way to check the fork() function without including an infinite loop inside???

Originally Posted by Nyah Check

first of all i think the logic of the first and second while loops is not the best the while(1) thing would not stop since its always true. don't you have a better way to check the fork() function without including an infinite loop inside???

The program is never meant to stop, just continually print whichever process isn't paused! Hence infinite loops!

Why are you calling pause from inside your signal handler? I'm pretty sure that won't do anything useful unless you explicitly make signals reentrant (but you might end up with a stack overflow if you do that in your current code).

Originally Posted by christop

Why are you calling pause from inside your signal handler? I'm pretty sure that won't do anything useful unless you explicitly make signals reentrant (but you might end up with a stack overflow if you do that in your current code).

So would you recommend I send the SIGALRM from the handler?

No Salem, that's not what I want. But its good to see the pause & alarm are working together!
The idea is to have the parent print line after line for 5 seconds & pause, then the child print line after line for 5 seconds & pause, restarting the parent & looping like that continuously!

No... still not quite right, but I like the way you've used the kill( pid ) thing! The messages are printing one at a time rather than very quickly, repeatedly until the process change... not far off though!

Have you found already a solution?

The reason why your initial approach doesn't work is that after fork() both processes are independent from each other and thus don't see the alarm call from the other (both will pause infinitely after the reach the signal handler the first time). alarm() only signals a SIGALRM to the calling process.
You need some kind of interprocess communication between both processes.

Originally Posted by JM1082

The idea is to have the parent print line after line for 5 seconds & pause, then the child print line after line for 5 seconds & pause, restarting the parent & looping like that continuously!

How about that (I use one second cycles to make the effect more distinct):

Code:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <signal.h>
 
void wake_up(int sig);
void alarm_handler(int sig);
 
int active;    
pid_t child_pid, parent_pid;
 
int main(void)
{
    char *output;

    signal(SIGALRM, alarm_handler);
    signal(SIGUSR1, wake_up);
    alarm(1);

    parent_pid = getpid();
    if((child_pid = fork()) != 0)
    {
        output = "[PARENT] Serving HTTP Session 2";
        active = 1;         // parent starts being active
    }
    else
    {
        output = "[CHILD] Serving HTTP Session 1";
        active = 0;         // child starts being inactive
    }
    
    while(1)
        if(active)
            puts(output);

    exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
}
 
void alarm_handler(int sig)
{
    pid_t my_pid = getpid();    // get pid from current process
    active = 0;                 // inactivate current process
//  signal(SIGALRM, alarm_handler); // depending on your system you may have to reestablish the signal handler
    if (my_pid == parent_pid)
        kill(child_pid, SIGUSR1);   // "wake up" child
    else 
        kill(parent_pid, SIGUSR1);  // "wake up" parent
}

void wake_up(int sig)
{
//  signal(SIGUSR1, wake_up);  // depending on your system you may have to reestablish the signal handler
    alarm(1);       // start new cycle
    active = 1;     // activate called process
}

BTW: signal() should be replaced by sigaction() for more portable programs.

Bye, Andreas