Ah, but C# was never meant as a better C++, just as C++ was meant to be a better C. It would have been in fact incredibly offensive to have named it (C++)++. Or anything similar.Originally Posted by Decrypt
Regardless, there was never the intention of using this particular naming convention to compare it to C++ in terms of being better or worse. It's just a name. Lets pound on the pretentious use of Objective C or D for instance, if that is really what we want to do.