ARGH! (argc and argv too!) HD Space!!!

This is a discussion on ARGH! (argc and argv too!) HD Space!!! within the A Brief History of Cprogramming.com forums, part of the Community Boards category; Somebody explain this: Starting point HD space = 2 GB Windows likes to lie and makes it 1 GB Deletion ...

  1. #1
    l'Anziano DavidP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Plano, Texas, United States
    Posts
    2,738

    ARGH! (argc and argv too!) HD Space!!!

    Somebody explain this:

    Starting point HD space = 2 GB
    Windows likes to lie and makes it 1 GB
    Deletion of almost every game makes it go back to 2 GB
    Installation of XP makes HD space go to 800 MB, which then gradually reduces to between 100 and 300 MB, even though nothing is being installed, and wavers between those points every day, never being static.

    Is accurately reporting HD space something MS will never get right?
    My Website

    "Circular logic is good because it is."

  2. #2
    31173 h4x0r gnu-ehacks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    556
    Well first of all, Windows operating systems tend to be very large. I'm not sure if Windows uses this, but it might also be automatically allocated swap space.

    Hmm...I dunno, could be anything.
    What will people say if they hear that I'm a Jesus freak?
    What will people do if they find that it's true?
    I don't really care if they label me a Jesus freak, there is no disguising the truth!

    Jesus Freak, D.C. Talk

    -gnu-ehacks

  3. #3
    _B-L-U-E_ Betazep's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    1,412
    That is a really good likelyhood. Manage your own swap size... but make sure you set it big enough.... you can do it under Properties--Performance
    Blue

  4. #4
    A Banana Yoshi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    859
    Windows uses a lot of memory resources as well as the processor. We call it the "mem eater"
    ----------------------
    Engineer223
    Yoshi

  5. #5
    Linguistic Engineer... doubleanti's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    2,459
    yes, it does seem a bit [!] exaggerated... did you do a really clean install? have you kept everything under wraps? close eye? how long have you since your last format? etc...
    hasafraggin shizigishin oppashigger...

  6. #6
    Former Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    955
    first: it's not called swap space, it's called Virtual Memory.

    second: virtual memory doesn't make windows report lower HD usage, it is mostly caused by dirty-shutdowns, don't ask me why, but I'm sure it's caused by that

    third: Windows is not big!, it takes 1 GB, while Linux may easily take 5GB PLUS 2GB swap space, but you can always have more.

    Oskilian

  7. #7
    A Banana Yoshi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    859
    Linux only takes about 750 mb, do you actually own a Linux OS?
    ----------------------------
    Engineer223
    Yoshi

  8. #8
    Former Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    955
    Have you ever installed Linux with Sources?

    Oskilian

  9. #9
    Linguistic Engineer... doubleanti's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    2,459
    ouch, now that's a lot... and i can't see how...
    hasafraggin shizigishin oppashigger...

  10. #10
    _B-L-U-E_ Betazep's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    1,412
    >>>first: it's not called swap space, it's called Virtual Memory.

    Whatever... it is the same thing. Strike one.

    >>>second: virtual memory doesn't make windows report lower HD usage, it is mostly caused by dirty-shutdowns, don't ask me why, but I'm sure it's caused by that

    Virtual memory does take HD space, period. 'Dirty Shutdowns'... is that the technical term. Foul tip. Strike two.

    >>>third: Windows is not big!, it takes 1 GB, while Linux may easily take 5GB PLUS 2GB swap space, but you can always have more.

    Windows as an OS is a bigger install than Linux as an OS. You can't say... "well if you install linux with sources.... blah blah blah." That is irrelevant. The swap space in Linux can be whatever size you want. I use 128Mb (I don't know where the hell you get 2G). My windows install was 1.4Gb. Three strikes... you're out.

    Fourth... you couldn't be more wrong, but I am sure you will defend yourself till the bitter end.
    Last edited by Betazep; 12-05-2001 at 01:19 AM.
    Blue

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    412
    Well, 2 GB is rather little, considering how space-intensive most things tend to be these days.

    Consider simply getting a bigger drive. I've got 80 GB total now, and it hardly cost much at all. 45 GB drives sell for $90-95 US. I just got a 60 GB drive for $110.

  12. #12
    _B-L-U-E_ Betazep's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    1,412
    Well if he is only using a 2G drive, his MB might not support drives of that size.

    What I would do is set my swap (I will call it whatever the hell I want to) to 1Mb bigger than the available ram.

    VM/swap does register on your HD report for remaining space. I just verified.

    (Although, you may be talking about actual HD size and not remaining space... you need to clarify)

    Also, run scandisk....
    Last edited by Betazep; 12-05-2001 at 01:25 AM.
    Blue

  13. #13
    the hat of redundancy hat nvoigt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Hannover, Germany
    Posts
    3,139
    Get a bigger HD. For installing a system nowadays, I wouldn't even start below 4GB + additional space for games and data.

    Windows + Office + Visual Studio alone take up the first 3.5G. Additional Tools take up another 500M. You rarely see a game that uses less than 500M and you need to store your data somewhere, too.
    hth
    -nv

    She was so Blonde, she spent 20 minutes looking at the orange juice can because it said "Concentrate."

    When in doubt, read the FAQ.
    Then ask a smart question.

  14. #14
    _B-L-U-E_ Betazep's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    1,412
    >>>Well, 2 GB is rather little,

    LOL. I have a 500Mb drive in my 486/100. To that little drive, 2 gigs is a monster!!!
    Blue

  15. #15
    the hat of redundancy hat nvoigt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Hannover, Germany
    Posts
    3,139
    >LOL. I have a 500Mb drive in my 486/100

    But you don't install XP on that fellow, do you *g*
    hth
    -nv

    She was so Blonde, she spent 20 minutes looking at the orange juice can because it said "Concentrate."

    When in doubt, read the FAQ.
    Then ask a smart question.

Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. Using argc and argv data
    By Rad_Turnip in forum C Programming
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-31-2006, 06:09 AM
  2. argc & argv
    By miryellis in forum C Programming
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 09-20-2004, 12:59 AM
  3. how do i? re: argc - argv
    By luigi40 in forum C Programming
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-11-2004, 11:17 AM
  4. argh! (and argv and argc too!!)
    By DavidP in forum C# Programming
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 02-29-2004, 08:42 AM
  5. argh! (argc and argv too!)
    By DavidP in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-11-2001, 04:01 PM

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21