View Poll Results: What would you prefer?

Voters
10. You may not vote on this poll
  • Athlon XP

    10 100.00%
  • Semptron

    0 0%

Semptron vs Athlon XP

This is a discussion on Semptron vs Athlon XP within the A Brief History of Cprogramming.com forums, part of the Community Boards category; I've been cruising along tigerdirect.com and the only difference I found between the two were the cache size. Well, the ...

  1. #1
    In your face... ha ha ha Liger86's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Motorcity Capital
    Posts
    321

    Semptron vs Athlon XP

    I've been cruising along tigerdirect.com and the only difference I found between the two were the cache size. Well, the semptron is the newer one of them why is it slower? Or did I just get confused?
    From Ukraine with love!

    Internationally known widely respected

    - Digitally yourz -

  2. #2
    verbose cat
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    209
    The Semperon is their budget chip, similar to the Celeron for Intell processors.
    abachler: "A great programmer never stops optimizing a piece of code until it consists of nothing but preprocessor directives and comments "

  3. #3
    Jez
    Jez is offline
    The C-er
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    192
    There are 2 sorts of sempron, one is a rebadged Athlon XP with some minor enhancements, The other is an athlon 64 with the 64bit extensions removed, and a 333MHz bus speed. The poll seems a bit pointless, everyone would prefer an Athlon 64. (if money were no object). The Sempron is a good budget chip though.

  4. #4
    5|-|1+|-|34|) ober's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    4,429
    If money were no object, you'd get an Athlon FX chip. The Athlon 64s are cheaper than their comparable (and I say so very loosely based on RATED processor speed) Intel chip.

  5. #5
    RoD
    RoD is offline
    Redundantly Redundant RoD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    6,331
    dont know ober, FX are veyr nice, but so is opteron : )

  6. #6
    BMJ
    BMJ is offline
    Banal internet user
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    1,380
    Quote Originally Posted by RoD
    dont know ober, FX are veyr nice, but so is opteron : )
    They're both AMD64.

    Multi-core Opterons come this year



    Athlon FX 55 outperforms all (currently), with a hefty price tag of $800
    Last edited by BMJ; 02-27-2005 at 11:14 AM.

  7. #7
    Registered User TravisS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    536
    The Sempron (not Semptron, not Semperon) is basically a 166 MHz FSB t-bred Athlon XP.

    The performance ratings are comparible to the Celeron, so don't compare a Sempron 2600+ to a Athlon XP 2600+ for example, the Athlon XP will walk all over it.

    The Athlon 64 semprons are supposed be pretty good, after all, they get all of the goodies such as on-chip memory controller, hyper transport, etc...
    Only problem is they're limited to the otherwise dead socket 754 platform.

  8. #8
    Jez
    Jez is offline
    The C-er
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    192
    Not as dead as socket A I'd say.

  9. #9
    In your face... ha ha ha Liger86's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Motorcity Capital
    Posts
    321
    So does this mean Socket A is gonna die in near future?

    I think if that be the case, and considering that things happened this way; I think Semptron should have never been introduced into the market, because from what I hear that is some slow bus speeds that semptron operates at.
    From Ukraine with love!

    Internationally known widely respected

    - Digitally yourz -

  10. #10
    Jez
    Jez is offline
    The C-er
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    192
    Well the Sempron is the Duron replacement. I beleive AMD are keeping socket 754 on as their budget platform, and socket 939 for mainstream desktop.

    Incidentally, I just bought a Sempron 3100+ (Socket 754 , 1.8GHz) for a freind who's on a budget. I didn't fancy the Socket A Semprons, since as others have pointed out, it's just a rebadged athlon XP, but with a higher price tag. So maybe AMD are getting a little cynical now they have a market share - playing intel at their own game.

    The Bus Speed isn't too slow, O.K. 333Mhz vs 400MHz for the Athlon branded chips. I reckon it's more a means to separate their budget offerings from the mainstream stuff. In practice I doubt that it makes much difference to performance in real world applications, maybe a few percent.

    In any case, you have a good choice of CPU's these days. When you compare the AMD offerings with intel, you have to say they look pretty good. (especially if you're spending your own cash).

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    168
    Are those races from Starwars?
    -Felix
    Rots Soft
    If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.
    Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955)

  12. #12
    JZA
    JZA is offline
    Ooh Yeah! JZA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1
    Go for the XP

  13. #13
    Jez
    Jez is offline
    The C-er
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    192
    Actually I misinformed. The Sempron 3100+ has 400MHz FSB like Athlon 64.

Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-07-2009, 11:31 AM
  2. Need help with program
    By HAssan in forum C Programming
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-10-2007, 08:05 PM
  3. Question..
    By pode in forum Windows Programming
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 12-19-2004, 06:05 PM
  4. Athlon XP 2600+
    By Necrodeemer in forum Tech Board
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-11-2003, 07:39 AM
  5. Windows XP regression over time
    By DavidP in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 12-17-2002, 09:49 AM

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21