Explain this whole "Big Bang" thing to me

This is a discussion on Explain this whole "Big Bang" thing to me within the A Brief History of Cprogramming.com forums, part of the Community Boards category; There is one angle to the "before the BB" that hasn't been explored here yet. Extending on Darkness's excellent wrap-up ...

  1. #61
    Cat without Hat CornedBee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    8,893
    There is one angle to the "before the BB" that hasn't been explored here yet. Extending on Darkness's excellent wrap-up of the relativity theory, there is another factor that influences the passage of time, and that's mass, or rather mass concentration.

    If a lot of mass is concentrated in one place, the passage of time is slower there. The more mass in one place, the slower.

    As the Big Bang started, all the mass of the universe was concentrated into one infinitely small point. This means that the mass density was infinitely large. Which has the same effect on the stuff there as travelling at light speed: no time passes for the traveller/amassed one. Therefore, at least for whatever was at the place where the Big Bang happened, no time passed and the question of what was before lacks a reference. Before and after are a matter of time, and where no time passes, before has no meaning.
    All the buzzt!
    CornedBee

    "There is not now, nor has there ever been, nor will there ever be, any programming language in which it is the least bit difficult to write bad code."
    - Flon's Law

  2. #62
    Toaster Zach L.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    2,686
    While a good explanation, the transforms in Darkness's post are a bit off. They should be Lorentz transforms.

    *edit*
    This doesn't really make a difference to the arguments, but for anyone interested in the mathematics of SR, a search of Lorentz transforms would be enlightening. Thats the only reason I posted this.
    Last edited by Zach L.; 01-14-2005 at 09:00 AM.
    The word rap as it applies to music is the result of a peculiar phonological rule which has stripped the word of its initial voiceless velar stop.

  3. #63
    Registered User axon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Mt. Prospect, IL
    Posts
    2,572
    As the Big Bang started, all the mass of the universe was concentrated into one infinitely small point. This means that the mass density was infinitely large. Which has the same effect on the stuff there as travelling at light speed: no time passes for the traveller/amassed one. Therefore, at least for whatever was at the place where the Big Bang happened, no time passed and the question of what was before lacks a reference. Before and after are a matter of time, and where no time passes, before has no meaning
    Einstein realized that same fact and had a very hard time agreeing with it...I read somewhere that the mass density was as big as several hundreds of thousands of tons per cubic inch amazing

    some entropy with that sink? entropysink.com

    there are two cardinal sins from which all others spring: Impatience and Laziness. - franz kafka

  4. #64
    Carnivore ('-'v) Hunter2's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    2,879
    the mass density was as big as several hundreds of thousands of tons per cubic inch
    Didn't CornedBee just say it was probably infinite? You're off by about infinity

    Therefore, at least for whatever was at the place where the Big Bang happened, no time passed and the question of what was before lacks a reference. Before and after are a matter of time, and where no time passes, before has no meaning.
    Right, but that doesn't explain how it ever banged.

    It reminds me of the good 'ol Achilles racing the hare paradox - the hare has a small headstart, and achilles runs at some speed faster than the hare. Achilles can never overtake the hare, because every time he gets to where the hare was, the hare has already moved on forward To resolve the paradox, you have to look from an external perspective and rather than considering each time frame that continually changes as the distance between them shrinks, you look at the steady progression of time as Achilles catches up and eventually overlaps the hare.

    Unfortunately in this case we're saying that all space and time are shrunk to one point, and time from every point of reference in the universe is stuck. Logically then, we don't exist yet
    Just Google It. √

    (\ /)
    ( . .)
    c(")(") This is bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.

  5. #65
    C++ Witch laserlight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    21,662
    But surely the Earth is bound because the Earth exist in 3 dimensions.
    Perhaps not to an observer that exists in only 2 dimensions.
    In that sense the universe might be 'infinite' to us, when it is not.
    C + C++ Compiler: MinGW port of GCC
    Version Control System: Bazaar

    Look up a C++ Reference and learn How To Ask Questions The Smart Way

  6. #66
    S Sang-drax's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Göteborg, Sweden
    Posts
    2,072
    Quote Originally Posted by Darkness
    oh yeah, when you are going 30 miles per hour, here's what your passage of time looks like:

    (670x10^6-30) / 670 x 10^6 = 1 - (30 / 670x10^6) = .999999955
    No no no.
    It is not linear.

    If an object travels at speed v, the number you seek will be sqrt(1 - (v/c)^2).

    EDIT: This means that for normal speeds, the difference is very small, but when you approach the speed of light, a change of speed of 30 km/h can mean a lot.
    Last edited by Sang-drax; 01-14-2005 at 11:41 AM.
    Last edited by Sang-drax : Tomorrow at 02:21 AM. Reason: Time travelling

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345
Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. Saying the right thing, right time!
    By RoD in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-11-2005, 03:43 PM
  2. The program save some funny thing
    By nasa in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-18-2004, 09:37 AM
  3. A very strange thing
    By gustavosserra in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-15-2003, 12:43 PM
  4. Can someone explain this to me plz...
    By CAP in forum C Programming
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-23-2002, 01:30 PM

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21