VB .Net : is it worth the trouble?

This is a discussion on VB .Net : is it worth the trouble? within the A Brief History of Cprogramming.com forums, part of the Community Boards category; Originally Posted by B0bDole what does that^^ have to do with vb ? Hmmm....after second thought, my quote does not ...

  1. #16
    unleashed alphaoide's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    696
    Quote Originally Posted by B0bDole
    what does that^^ have to do with vb?
    Hmmm....after second thought, my quote does not really show accurate info on popularity of programming languages out there. I was just trying to answer original poster's question
    i don't know if Vb.Net will add anything to my career.
    source: compsci textbooks, cboard.cprogramming.com, world wide web, common sense

  2. #17
    former member Brain Cell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    472
    Well i didn't quite get what i was looking for , but thanks for participating guys
    My Tutorials :
    - Bad programming practices in : C
    - C\C++ Tips
    (constrcutive criticism is very welcome)


    - Brain Cell

  3. #18
    chococoder
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    515
    Wow, VB isn't even listed and Java is used by 139% (I know, I know, but you know how reporters think) of respondents.

  4. #19
    Cat without Hat CornedBee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    8,893
    146%, if you include the J2ME count.
    All the buzzt!
    CornedBee

    "There is not now, nor has there ever been, nor will there ever be, any programming language in which it is the least bit difficult to write bad code."
    - Flon's Law

  5. #20
    essence of digital xddxogm3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    589
    I believe it is only worth it if you are in a non-programming position.
    this would probably be good if you were in a general non-code producing position where compiling and writing code is not your primary job objective. example would be if you had microsoft office and wanted to manipulate it using the macro editor. or if for some obscure reason they wanted you write a vb stand alone.
    but if you are in the profession of coding, i do not believe it would be the most valuable tool in your tool box, but maybe there is some company that writes mainly in vb (maybe vbscript for the web.) ... this is just ramblings of an opinion from a student that has no real grasp of what is done in the real world.
    Last edited by xviddivxoggmp3; 12-01-2004 at 09:05 AM.
    "Hence to fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence;
    supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting."
    Art of War Sun Tzu

  6. #21
    Registered User major_small's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    2,787
    Quote Originally Posted by Bubba
    I've only coded in VB6 but several of my friends have coded in VB.NET. Essentially not much has changed.
    I've coded in both, and while I only learned a little about VB.NET and alot less about VB6, they're syntax seems pretty different. other than that, like you pointed out they seem the same.

    VB is nice to play with every once and a while and is good to learn if you want to interface with Access or Excel or something, but other than that, it's not really worth much IMO.

    There are a good amount of companies looking for VB programmers, though.

    I've learned C++,PHP,JAVA, and VB, and I would use them in that order. C++ and PHP both have completely different uses, JAVA is kinda messy and very slow IMO, and VB is just a windows thing.
    Join is in our Unofficial Cprog IRC channel
    Server: irc.phoenixradio.org
    Channel: #Tech


    Team Cprog Folding@Home: Team #43476
    Download it Here
    Detailed Stats Here
    More Detailed Stats
    52 Members so far, are YOU a member?
    Current team score: 1223226 (ranked 374 of 45152)

    The CBoard team is doing better than 99.16% of the other teams
    Top 5 Members: Xterria(518175), pianorain(118517), Bennet(64957), JaWiB(55610), alphaoide(44374)

    Last Updated on: Wed, 30 Aug, 2006 @ 2:30 PM EDT

  7. #22
    Student Forever! bookworm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    132
    VB.net has gone a step further than its parent, VB6 by becoming an object oriented language. It focusses on ease of use while allowing the power of OOP. However, obviously,not all powers could be handed over, and according to me , a c++ programmer will invariably find it irritating when he finds features like Operator Overloading and Vector programming missing. Also, stupid VB programmers who are not acquainted with OOP will find it mind-boggling. VB.net is meant only for intelligent VB6 programmers who have the capability of easy migration.

  8. #23
    Banned nickname_changed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    986
    Quote Originally Posted by Bubba
    ...In VB6 or VB in general you can still put a button on your form, but you cannot add methods to it or add properties. They have set methods and set properties. So what VB really comes down to is this....
    Lets not confuse Visual Basic 6 with Visual Basic .NET.

    VB.NET is object oriented, so to do what you are describing you would simply inherit from Button to create BubbasButton, and add your methods and properties to it.

    To the OP: I would give it a shot. While actually knowing Visual Basic .NET in itself may not be very beneficial in the long run, you will learn a lot about the .NET framework, and once you know VB.NET picking up other .NET languages like C# and Managed C++ (as you already have a background in C languages) should take all of a few days.

    A few of the opinions here seem to stem from experience with Visual Basic 6 or previous, and to those people I reccomend at least glancing over the features new to VB.NET. It is not just an upgrade to VB6 with a ".NET tag" on the end, but an entire rewrite of the language around the .NET framework.

  9. #24
    Rez
    Rez is offline
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    82
    Bah! Y'all should study MS Quick Basic 1.1 instead. Or COBOL perhaps
    Last edited by Rez; 12-04-2004 at 09:32 AM.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. migrate from .Net 2.0 to .Net 3.0
    By George2 in forum C# Programming
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-25-2007, 04:07 AM
  2. Some .NET Distribution Stats
    By nickname_changed in forum C# Programming
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-14-2005, 03:41 AM
  3. DLL Error with VB .NET Program
    By willc0de4food in forum Windows Programming
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-09-2005, 02:38 PM
  4. .net
    By ygfperson in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 02-15-2002, 12:15 AM
  5. Visual J#
    By mfc2themax in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-08-2001, 02:41 PM

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21