Compare C reference books

This is a discussion on Compare C reference books within the A Brief History of Cprogramming.com forums, part of the Community Boards category; I am considering buying a C reference book. The two I have in mind are: C: A Reference Manual , ...

  1. #1
    ... kermit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    1,528

    Compare C reference books

    I am considering buying a C reference book. The two I have in mind are:

    • C: A Reference Manual, by Samuel P. Harbison and Guy L. Steele
    • The Standard C Library by P.J. Plauger


    Now I know both of these books usually are recommended, so in that light it seems hard to choose. For one thing are they fairly comparable, or is having both books worthwhile? (No sense in redundancy).

    ~/

  2. #2
    Bob Dole for '08 B0bDole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    618
    No sense in redundancy
    redundancy is your best friend
    Hmm

  3. #3
    Rad gcn_zelda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    942
    Redundancy and repetion and redundancy are the keys to learning, my young Padawan.

  4. #4
    ... kermit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    1,528
    Well for research purposes, cross referencing is never a bad idea...

  5. #5
    Toaster Zach L.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    2,686
    If you know the language and are just using them as references, there is no sense in too much redundancy. I'm not familiar enough with the books to recommend one over the other, though.
    The word rap as it applies to music is the result of a peculiar phonological rule which has stripped the word of its initial voiceless velar stop.

  6. #6
    unleashed alphaoide's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    696
    You just have to pick one and later either regret it or satisfied with it. Been there done that. You don't know the value of a book until you read it through, not just skim through it in the bookstore (have u done it btw?).
    source: compsci textbooks, cboard.cprogramming.com, world wide web, common sense

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    101
    Both are worth having simply because they serve different purposes. The former is a language reference that comes close to the C standard in accuracy while still maintaing an approachable air. There are subtle mistakes though, so it would also be wise to buy the standard for cross-referencing. The latter focuses exclusively on the C standard library, and rather than just giving definitions and simple examples, a full explanation is made on what the standard says (pre-C99), how each part should/could be used, and a full implementation. The source has mistakes here and there, but for the most part the code is of a high quality and can be learned from with confidence.

Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. Undefined Reference Compiling Error
    By AlakaAlaki in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-27-2008, 12:45 PM
  2. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-09-2007, 03:37 PM
  3. Problem with Makefile
    By pinkprincess in forum C Programming
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-24-2007, 10:02 AM
  4. GCC - Strange networking functions error.
    By maththeorylvr in forum Windows Programming
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-05-2005, 01:00 AM
  5. OpenGL vs. DirectX ???
    By Grumpy_Old_Man in forum Game Programming
    Replies: 55
    Last Post: 08-18-2003, 12:52 PM

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21