As you can see in my sig, i tried to use an image. If i remember right i saw the [img] tag in sigs is disabled, are all images in sigs disabled? Just curious, thanks![]()
This is a discussion on Images in Sig within the A Brief History of Cprogramming.com forums, part of the Community Boards category; As you can see in my sig, i tried to use an image. If i remember right i saw the ...
As you can see in my sig, i tried to use an image. If i remember right i saw the [img] tag in sigs is disabled, are all images in sigs disabled? Just curious, thanks![]()
01110111011000010110110001100100011011110010000001 11000101110101011010010111010000100000011011000110 10010110011001100101001000000111100101101111011101 0100100000011011100111010101100010
Since IMG tags and HTML tags are both disabled, the only graphics you're going to get in sigs are smilies, sorry.
-Govtcheez
govtcheez03@hotmail.com
Yep bandwith related issue i guess.
Originally Posted by Salem
Doesn't hurt our bandwidth at all (since they're hosted offsite), but sig images are usually a) huge or b) not worksafe.
-Govtcheez
govtcheez03@hotmail.com
Govtcheez = my hero![]()
Originally Posted by Salem
ya i was ganna say it wouldent involve band since their hosted elsewhere. But i still say they should enable em with size restrictions, seen it elsewhere lol. But oh well :/
01110111011000010110110001100100011011110010000001 11000101110101011010010111010000100000011011000110 10010110011001100101001000000111100101101111011101 0100100000011011100111010101100010
> seen it elsewhere lol
And that means it's not us.
-Govtcheez
govtcheez03@hotmail.com
Go figure, "elsewhere", meaning not us.. never woulda figured lol. Thanks for the enlightening insight![]()
01110111011000010110110001100100011011110010000001 11000101110101011010010111010000100000011011000110 10010110011001100101001000000111100101101111011101 0100100000011011100111010101100010
me and kermi had this discussion when the board was upgraded. html/img tags can be easily exploited with bad code and such so its also a security risk to enable them
As a general observation, it seems slightly lame to have a bunch of poo in the sig (like blinking stuff) and then have a one line post. I find it hard to sort through posts like that. Text is cool.
- Using The GNU GDB Debugger: Tutorial with examples and exercises.
>Doesn't hurt our bandwidth at all (since they're hosted offsite), but sig images are usually a) huge or b) not worksafe.
c) they are REALLY ANNOYING!!!
ADVISORY: This users posts are rated CP-MA, for Mature Audiences only.
Originally Posted by no-one
still dont get that, most of you who think that way must stay isolated from other forums i assume then right lol? Just since i have yet to see a forum with images blocked, usually its phpbb forums, but some here and there are vb(least out of the 20 or so i visit, and the 100 or so iv seen).
So either you stay isolated from other forums or you must have a counseling to deal with it lol![]()
01110111011000010110110001100100011011110010000001 11000101110101011010010111010000100000011011000110 10010110011001100101001000000111100101101111011101 0100100000011011100111010101100010
Thank you for enlightening us mortals, oh arbiter of all that is good on forums.
-Govtcheez
govtcheez03@hotmail.com
I swear if you put one more lol in there, I'm going to hurt you. Man that's annoying.Originally Posted by Zeusbwr