Anti-spyware bill flies through HoR

This is a discussion on Anti-spyware bill flies through HoR within the A Brief History of Cprogramming.com forums, part of the Community Boards category; http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/interne....ap/index.html The one that passed would subject spyware makers to fines (it passed 399-1), and there's another in committee to ...

  1. #1
    Mayor of Awesometown Govtcheez's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    8,825

    Anti-spyware bill flies through HoR

    http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/interne....ap/index.html

    The one that passed would subject spyware makers to fines (it passed 399-1), and there's another in committee to make them subject to criminal charges, as well.

    Too bad this won't really affect overseas spyware companies, but it's a start.

  2. #2
    Super Moderator VirtualAce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    9,596
    Very nice. I'm so sick of hogging resources on my system with spybot and every other spyware program I've got, just to browse the net, play online games, or research.

    Bout time someone did something about the morons who code that stuff.

  3. #3
    Anti-Poster
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    1,399
    I wonder what in the world Rep. Ron Paul (the only one that voted against the bill) was thinking. "No, I love my spyware!"
    If I did your homework for you, then you might pass your class without learning how to write a program like this. Then you might graduate and get your degree without learning how to write a program like this. You might become a professional programmer without knowing how to write a program like this. Someday you might work on a project with me without knowing how to write a program like this. Then I would have to do you serious bodily harm. - Jack Klein

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    128
    thats great thanks for the post i havent
    heard anything about that.

  5. #5
    Mayor of Awesometown Govtcheez's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    8,825
    > I wonder what in the world Rep. Ron Paul (the only one that voted against the bill) was thinking.

    Bonzi Buddy says he's my friend!

    The article says he usually votes against new spending measures. I'm wondering how he expects to get anything done without spending money.

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    128
    question, why is this dip still in office?
    *retorical, dont answer!*

  7. #7
    5|-|1+|-|34|) ober's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    4,429
    Finally. Now maybe the next time I download a screensaver, it won't install 50 spywares before letting me use it.

  8. #8
    Registered User hk_mp5kpdw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Northern Virginia/Washington DC Metropolitan Area
    Posts
    3,801
    Spyware Cases Filed
    By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

    Published: October 8, 2004


    WASHINGTON, Oct. 7 (AP) - The Federal Trade Commission on Thursday filed the first case in the country against software companies accused of infecting computers with intrusive "spyware" and then trying to sell people the solution.

    The commission accused the companies of infecting computers with unsolicited software, showering computer screens with pop-up ads and then trying to get consumers to pay $30 to fix it. It is seeking an injunction to get the companies, owned by the same person, to stop and to offer restitution to consumers.

    The agency requested a temporary restraining order from the Federal District Court for New Hampshire against Seismic Entertainment Productions, Smartbot.Net and Sanford Wallace.

    This week, the House passed two bills that would outlaw spyware.
    That was fast!
    "Owners of dogs will have noticed that, if you provide them with food and water and shelter and affection, they will think you are god. Whereas owners of cats are compelled to realize that, if you provide them with food and water and shelter and affection, they draw the conclusion that they are gods."
    -Christopher Hitchens

  9. #9
    Mayor of Awesometown Govtcheez's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    8,825
    Wait, doesn't the bill have to get past the Senate first?

  10. #10
    Sweet
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Tucson, Arizona
    Posts
    1,805
    Ya and then get signed by bush
    Woop?

  11. #11
    It's full of stars adrianxw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    4,831
    >>> wonder what in the world Rep. Ron Paul (the only one that voted against the bill)

    His point is that it is not the role of the US government to police the internet.

    >>> Too bad this won't really affect overseas spyware companies

    I'm betting it will not have any impact on US firms that spy on systems outside of the US either. New SCientist figures showed 70% of spyware on EU computers was placed there and is monitored from the US.
    Wave upon wave of demented avengers march cheerfully out of obscurity unto the dream.

  12. #12
    Mayor of Awesometown Govtcheez's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    8,825
    You're upset that the US is policing the Internet, but you're also upset that the US isn't doing enough to police the Internet?

  13. #13
    It's full of stars adrianxw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    4,831
    Read my post Cheez. The question was asked earlier in the thread why Senator Ron Paul, the only person who voted against the bill, had done so. I was offering the answer to that particular question. I can supply references if required, but a google will find the statement.

    I AM royally fed up with my interceptors telling me again and again that they have blocked yet another attempt to apply predominantly US originated spyware products to my systems. As I said in my previous post though, I doubt any of the current legislation going through the US houses will do anything to prevent that.

    If you check, you will find that the story that prompted this thread is only 1 of several current attempts to legislate in this area.
    Wave upon wave of demented avengers march cheerfully out of obscurity unto the dream.

  14. #14
    Mayor of Awesometown Govtcheez's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    8,825
    > I can supply references if required, but a google will find the statement.

    OK, you're right. Sorry, my bad.

    > I doubt any of the current legislation going through the US houses will do anything to prevent that.

    Even the ones that would put the people in jail?

  15. #15
    It's full of stars adrianxw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    4,831
    >>> would put the people in jail?

    In jail for what though? Placing a piece of software on a PC outside of the US - jurisdiction? Receiving and profiting from said software - free trade?

    The spam rules did nothing to stem the tide of US originated spam here, why should they? The rules were to protect US consumers, not others from US business.
    Wave upon wave of demented avengers march cheerfully out of obscurity unto the dream.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. Is it truly "of the people, for the people, by the people"
    By vasanth in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 02-21-2003, 04:44 AM

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21