I don't know what this was. But I just want to know why its being covered up
I don't know what this was. But I just want to know why its being covered up
Warning: Opinions subject to change without notice
The C Library Reference Guide
Understand the fundamentals
Then have some more fun
Ah, that freaks me out.
Very intriguing, slightly disturbing. But if what that film implies is true you should only have to think about it for a minute why they would cover it up.
No, just no.
Yes, this isnt a simple open shut case...
Do a little googling... you will be even more intrigued.
EDIT:
ASCE Building report
http://fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf
EDIT2:
After comparing information between different sources and factual data. I find it completely reasonable that the 757 (Flight 77) could have in fact crashed into the pentagon as reported. I find no reson to object it.
Last edited by Vicious; 09-05-2004 at 12:44 AM.
/me grabs the tin foil
anybody need some?
just a few points:
airplanes make a mess on the ground
not when they don't hit the ground
no fire damage
that's because it collapsed...
can a plane punch a hole in a reinforced concrete wall?
that's kinda part of the point of reinforcing a concrete wall...
the fbi confiscated videos
no crap... when somebody attacks you, don't you want to know who it is? or would you rather just attack some random country for it?
Last edited by major_small; 09-05-2004 at 01:22 AM.
Join is in our Unofficial Cprog IRC channel
Server: irc.phoenixradio.org
Channel: #Tech
Team Cprog Folding@Home: Team #43476
Download it Here
Detailed Stats Here
More Detailed Stats
52 Members so far, are YOU a member?
Current team score: 1223226 (ranked 374 of 45152)
The CBoard team is doing better than 99.16% of the other teams
Top 5 Members: Xterria(518175), pianorain(118517), Bennet(64957), JaWiB(55610), alphaoide(44374)
Last Updated on: Wed, 30 Aug, 2006 @ 2:30 PM EDT
Yep, I believe if you read that pdf up there.. it will all make sense.
Like the moon landing...
No, you cant prove it, but the evidence FOR landing on the moon outweighs the evidence forNOT landing on the moon. Not to mention that the reasons claiming we didnt go to the moon are completely destructable.
Same thing in this case. Its all conspiracies people. Thats why they are called conspiracies and not fact
Now as for area 51.... that REALLY is interesting.
This article I found when looking around into the Pentagon flash video gives the explanation that I believe was the big deal at area 51. http://www.popularmechanics.com/scie...6/new_area_51/
The reason for a lot of the decreased damage was because they had just finished reinforcing that side of the building to withstand a missle attack. That included reinforcing the concrete and the windows.
And how does this theory explain the missing passengers and crew from flight 77?
there was an article on snopes about this...
EDIT: Here it is : http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm
there used to be something here, but not anymore
thats interesting. I never heard that they couldn't find anyone from that flight. Maybe they were incinerated on impact?Originally Posted by kermi3
Warning: Opinions subject to change without notice
The C Library Reference Guide
Understand the fundamentals
Then have some more fun
well, considering the jet fuel burns hot enough to melt steel, one could say that it could vaporize human material.Maybe they were incinerated on impact?
there used to be something here, but not anymore
Was about to post that when I started reading this thread, and you beat me to it.
"When I die I want to pass peacefully in my sleep like my grandfather did, not screaming and yelling like the passengers in his car."
wait why would americas government shoot a missile at itself that seems pretty crazy if you ask me
did you read the link up top?
