You have to watch this!

This is a discussion on You have to watch this! within the A Brief History of Cprogramming.com forums, part of the Community Boards category; I don't know what this was. But I just want to know why its being covered up...

  1. #1
    Registered User caroundw5h's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    751

    You have to watch this!

    I don't know what this was. But I just want to know why its being covered up

  2. #2
    i dont know Vicious's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    1,200
    Ah, that freaks me out.

  3. #3
    Registered User Draco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    463
    Very intriguing, slightly disturbing. But if what that film implies is true you should only have to think about it for a minute why they would cover it up.

  4. #4
    BMJ
    BMJ is offline
    Banal internet user BMJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Chicagoland
    Posts
    1,380
    No, just no.

  5. #5
    i dont know Vicious's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    1,200
    Yes, this isnt a simple open shut case...

    Do a little googling... you will be even more intrigued.

    EDIT:
    ASCE Building report
    http://fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf

    EDIT2:
    After comparing information between different sources and factual data. I find it completely reasonable that the 757 (Flight 77) could have in fact crashed into the pentagon as reported. I find no reson to object it.
    Last edited by Vicious; 09-05-2004 at 01:44 AM.

  6. #6
    Registered User major_small's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    2,787
    /me grabs the tin foil

    anybody need some?



    just a few points:

    airplanes make a mess on the ground
    not when they don't hit the ground

    no fire damage
    that's because it collapsed...

    can a plane punch a hole in a reinforced concrete wall?
    that's kinda part of the point of reinforcing a concrete wall...

    the fbi confiscated videos
    no crap... when somebody attacks you, don't you want to know who it is? or would you rather just attack some random country for it?
    Last edited by major_small; 09-05-2004 at 02:22 AM.
    Join is in our Unofficial Cprog IRC channel
    Server: irc.phoenixradio.org
    Channel: #Tech


    Team Cprog Folding@Home: Team #43476
    Download it Here
    Detailed Stats Here
    More Detailed Stats
    52 Members so far, are YOU a member?
    Current team score: 1223226 (ranked 374 of 45152)

    The CBoard team is doing better than 99.16% of the other teams
    Top 5 Members: Xterria(518175), pianorain(118517), Bennet(64957), JaWiB(55610), alphaoide(44374)

    Last Updated on: Wed, 30 Aug, 2006 @ 2:30 PM EDT

  7. #7
    i dont know Vicious's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    1,200
    Yep, I believe if you read that pdf up there.. it will all make sense.

    Like the moon landing...
    No, you cant prove it, but the evidence FOR landing on the moon outweighs the evidence forNOT landing on the moon. Not to mention that the reasons claiming we didnt go to the moon are completely destructable.

    Same thing in this case. Its all conspiracies people. Thats why they are called conspiracies and not fact

    Now as for area 51.... that REALLY is interesting.

  8. #8
    Registered User Draco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    463
    This article I found when looking around into the Pentagon flash video gives the explanation that I believe was the big deal at area 51. http://www.popularmechanics.com/scie...6/new_area_51/

  9. #9
    Lead Moderator kermi3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1998
    Posts
    2,595
    The reason for a lot of the decreased damage was because they had just finished reinforcing that side of the building to withstand a missle attack. That included reinforcing the concrete and the windows.

    And how does this theory explain the missing passengers and crew from flight 77?
    Kermi3

    If you're new to the boards, welcome and reading this will help you get started.
    Information on code tags may be found here

    - Sandlot is the highest form of sport.

  10. #10
    'AlHamdulillah
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    790
    there was an article on snopes about this...

    EDIT: Here it is : http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm
    there used to be something here, but not anymore

  11. #11
    Registered User caroundw5h's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    751
    Quote Originally Posted by kermi3
    The reason for a lot of the decreased damage was because they had just finished reinforcing that side of the building to withstand a missle attack. That included reinforcing the concrete and the windows.

    And how does this theory explain the missing passengers and crew from flight 77?
    thats interesting. I never heard that they couldn't find anyone from that flight. Maybe they were incinerated on impact?

  12. #12
    'AlHamdulillah
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    790
    Maybe they were incinerated on impact?
    well, considering the jet fuel burns hot enough to melt steel, one could say that it could vaporize human material.
    there used to be something here, but not anymore

  13. #13
    ___
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    806
    Quote Originally Posted by EvBladeRunnervE
    there was an article on snopes about this...

    EDIT: Here it is : http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm


    Was about to post that when I started reading this thread, and you beat me to it.
    "When I die I want to pass peacefully in my sleep like my grandfather did, not screaming and yelling like the passengers in his car."

  14. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    2,220
    wait why would americas government shoot a missile at itself that seems pretty crazy if you ask me

  15. #15
    Registered User Draco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    463
    did you read the link up top?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. watch variable??
    By haochao in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 10-12-2008, 01:34 PM
  2. Watch for mouse events
    By belhifet in forum Linux Programming
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-10-2007, 12:12 PM
  3. Live 8! Watch Now
    By anonytmouse in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 07-09-2005, 05:33 PM
  4. Child watch program need help
    By aaroroge in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-29-2005, 06:42 PM
  5. Some bottleneck in coding digital watch simulator
    By megablue in forum C Programming
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-29-2004, 10:39 AM

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21