THE END (of Borland C++ Builder)?

This is a discussion on THE END (of Borland C++ Builder)? within the A Brief History of Cprogramming.com forums, part of the Community Boards category; I've been looking to upgrade my compiler from my trusty BCB5, but have been worried (and confused) by what I've ...

  1. #1
    Code Monkey Davros's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    812

    Question THE END (of Borland C++ Builder)?

    I've been looking to upgrade my compiler from my trusty BCB5, but have been worried (and confused) by what I've been reading...



    Found this Open Letter from Borland...

    http://bdn.borland.com/article/0,1410,31277,00.html

    Is it the case that Borland are ceasing to support C++ Builder, or more specifically are they planning to cease support for C++ with CLX?

    I note in their open letter, they recommend Windows C++ developers switch to using their stuff for .NET. If this is the case, it looks to me like it would be better to switch to Microsoft (sorry Borland).

    Also, anyone know what Borland's wxWindows stuff is? Is it an equivalent of CLX, or a different beast entirely?
    OS: Windows XP
    Compilers: MinGW (Code::Blocks), BCB 5

    BigAngryDog.com

  2. #2
    Even death may die... Dante Shamest's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    970
    they recommend Windows C++ developers switch to using their stuff for .NET. If this is the case, it looks to me like it would be better to switch to Microsoft (sorry Borland).
    IMHO Microsoft's Visual Studio IDE would probably be better if you're targeting .NET. Their Delphi product is also migrating to .NET.

    Also, anyone know what Borland's wxWindows stuff is? Is it an equivalent of CLX, or a different beast entirely?
    They're using the open source wxWidgets (formally called wxWindows).. The API is pretty simple, but the .exes generated are painfully large (compared to plain Win32 API). But the development time you save will probably outweight some of the disadvantages.

  3. #3
    Code Monkey Davros's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    812
    Well, I don't want to particularly target .NET, but I do want to target Windows. What I loved about the VCL/CLX is that it provided a really efficient wrapper around the Win API. It is this I really want.

    I'm a bit annoyed with Borland cos with BCB6 (which I've been trialing) they're urging people to port all their VCL code to CLX, which now is looking like a completely pointless exercise.

    The wxWindows stuff looks like it maybe worth looking into.

    Guess I'll have to do some thinking & research.
    OS: Windows XP
    Compilers: MinGW (Code::Blocks), BCB 5

    BigAngryDog.com

Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. Modify to make Doubly Linked List
    By Dampecram in forum C Programming
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 11-03-2008, 07:25 PM
  2. Adventures in labyrinth generation.
    By guesst in forum Game Programming
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 10-12-2008, 02:30 PM
  3. Dikumud
    By maxorator in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-01-2005, 07:39 AM
  4. socket newbie, losing a few chars from server to client
    By registering in forum Linux Programming
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-07-2003, 12:48 PM
  5. Next Question...
    By Azmeos in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-06-2003, 03:40 PM

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21