Graphics

This is a discussion on Graphics within the A Brief History of Cprogramming.com forums, part of the Community Boards category; ...which is overkill since your eye can never see more than 30 FPS. So whether it gets 30,60,90 or 590 ...

  1. #16
    Super Moderator VirtualAce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    9,598
    ...which is overkill since your eye can never see more than 30 FPS. So whether it gets 30,60,90 or 590 it doesn't matter. As long as it does not slip below the 30 FPS threshold - that's where your eye begins to pick up jerking or hesitating in the graphics.

    I run an AMD Athlon 1.333 GHz with a GeForce 3 and 384 MB of non-DDR memory and have no probs at all. The only games that have even taxed the system a bit are Splinter Cell - my card did not like rendering the light maps on the walls and such, and Flight Sim 2004 - which is because the 3D engine pretty much sucks. I have non-DDR memory because DDR came out shortly after building my rig....ahhh I coulda screamed - but that's life.

    My point is you can do a hell of a lot with a little. Run your system lean and mean with minimal background crapola running and you should be fine with any newer card. But beware that any NVidia card with MX in the designation is going to be slower than the non-MX version. MX is the bargain card with lower memory bandwith and slower clock speed, but any NVidia card on a relatively new system will kick major butt.

  2. #17
    Registered User TravisS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    536
    That's also incorect. The eye can see MUCH more than 30 FPS, but 30 FPS at minimum is ideal for gaming, much less and it will become noticeably jerky.

    Take for example your Windows desktop. Run it at 60 FPS. OK, not too bad, but many windows and items will have a noticeable "flicker" to them. Increase the refresh rate, to at least 72 or so. The flicker will be decreased by alot. For SOME people this flicker does not completely go away until after 100 FPS... yes, some people can see at greater than 100 "FPS" (or course that's not the way the human eye actually works).

    The human eye at 30 FPS is just a myth...

    Here's just ONE link to a little more about this: clicky

    Oh, and P.S. Your GeForce 3 is FASTER than a Fx5200... no, I am not joking.

  3. #18
    The Defective GRAPE Lurker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    949
    I'm trying to spend less than 150, but I would be willing to go for around 200.
    Do not make direct eye contact with me.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. Turtle Graphics, how does it work?
    By freddyvorhees in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 08-28-2009, 10:57 AM
  2. Graphics Programming :: Approach and Books
    By kuphryn in forum Windows Programming
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-11-2004, 09:33 PM
  3. egavga.bgi problem
    By sunil21 in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-22-2003, 06:06 PM
  4. Graphics Devices and Cprintf clash
    By etnies in forum C Programming
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-09-2002, 12:14 PM

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21