real ai within 30 years?

This is a discussion on real ai within 30 years? within the A Brief History of Cprogramming.com forums, part of the Community Boards category; http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.04/joy_pr.html very interesting read But now, with the prospect of human-level computing power in about 30 years, a new idea ...

  1. #1
    i want wookie cookies the Wookie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    455

    real ai within 30 years?

    http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.04/joy_pr.html

    very interesting read

    But now, with the prospect of human-level computing power in about 30 years, a new idea suggests itself: that I may be working to create tools which will enable the construction of the technology that may replace our species. How do I feel about this? Very uncomfortable. Having struggled my entire career to build reliable software systems, it seems to me more than likely that this future will not work out as well as some people may imagine. My personal experience suggests we tend to overestimate our design abilities

    Given the incredible power of these new technologies, shouldn't we be asking how we can best coexist with them? And if our own extinction is a likely, or even possible, outcome of our technological development, shouldn't we proceed with great caution?
    As Drexler explained:

    "Plants" with "leaves" no more efficient than today's solar cells could out-compete real plants, crowding the biosphere with an inedible foliage. Tough omnivorous "bacteria" could out-compete real bacteria: They could spread like blowing pollen, replicate swiftly, and reduce the biosphere to dust in a matter of days. Dangerous replicators could easily be too tough, small, and rapidly spreading to stop - at least if we make no preparation. We have trouble enough controlling viruses and fruit flies.

    Among the cognoscenti of nanotechnology, this threat has become known as the "gray goo problem." Though masses of uncontrolled replicators need not be gray or gooey, the term "gray goo" emphasizes that replicators able to obliterate life might be less inspiring than a single species of crabgrass. They might be superior in an evolutionary sense, but this need not make them valuable.

    The gray goo threat makes one thing perfectly clear: We cannot afford certain kinds of accidents with replicating assemblers.


    Gray goo would surely be a depressing ending to our human adventure on Earth, far worse than mere fire or ice, and one that could stem from a simple laboratory accident. Oops.
    matrix anyone?

    this guy is pretty respected (he wrote vi )

    comments?

    reading towards the end, the projections are kinda scary actually.
    Last edited by the Wookie; 09-18-2003 at 05:56 PM.

  2. #2
    mov.w #$1337,D0 Jeremy G's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    704
    within 10 years.


    Possibly 5.

    This guy underestimates growth of technology.
    c++->visualc++->directx->opengl->c++;
    (it should be realized my posts are all in a light hearted manner. And should not be taken offense to.)

  3. #3
    ___
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    806
    I personally think hes a little paranoid. I HIGHLY doubt that we are going to die out anytime soon due to robots or canable barteria. I'll put 5000$ on that.
    "When I die I want to pass peacefully in my sleep like my grandfather did, not screaming and yelling like the passengers in his car."

  4. #4
    Mayor of Awesometown Govtcheez's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    8,825
    It's not possible because Jesus made us all special

  5. #5
    Cat
    Cat is offline
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    1,571
    I also think that replicating robots, although they may soon exist, will not be viable outside of a lab. The reason being, the materials which make up electronics must be very specific, and must have precisely controlled impurities, and the smaller the machine, the more precise must be its construction. The margin for error on silicon impurity concentrations drops as the gates become smaller and smaller.

    I also doubt we will soon see the days where machines can replace humans. Machines and men think in very different ways, and even technologies like neural networks can't truly emulate the massively interconnected, asynchronous network of the brain. Machines are superior at many kinds of tasks, but very much inferior at others, and I think that will always be the case.

    Heck, the human brain stem does feedback control of systems more complicated than any machine can yet handle, and the brain stem is the most primitive part of our brain.

    I also tend to disagree on the fact that the complexity of a machine equalling the complexity of the brain -- the two are so fundamentally different that it makes little sense to compare the two. Further, the approach that each uses to solve a problem are completely different as well.

    We've barely BEGUN to understand how our own brains work, and we think we can make a better system? I guess human arrogance scores a point, but in reality, I doubt we will ever go obsolete.
    Last edited by Cat; 09-18-2003 at 06:51 PM.
    You ever try a pink golf ball, Wally? Why, the wind shear on a pink ball alone can take the head clean off a 90 pound midget at 300 yards.

  6. #6
    mov.w #$1337,D0 Jeremy G's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    704
    I think what you need to realize is technology doesn't mean replacing what already exists, but building upon and enhancing what exists. Maybe you've seen something in the news, or on ripleys or NOVA about the blind man who has glasses that "plug" into his brain to feed him visual sample of the world using black/white dots. And while its not nearly a perfect or even close match to our biological site the key point here is technology - biology interactivity. We are learning how to send the brain signals - and read signals from the brain. The first "artificial" intelligence may not be technologically based, instead technology assited by biology. It may become possible to use actual brains in processing and memory. Im not going to say human brains - as for sure that wouldn't be allowed by the governments as part of moral opposition - but perhaps rat brains, cat brains, dog brains, eventually primate brains??

    The vision of a brain in a jar of water becomes more possib... plausible! as we gather more information on our own brains and how exactly they work.

    Before you tell me that this is all science fiction, try to remember what was science fiction 30 years ago, that is now science FACT today..
    c++->visualc++->directx->opengl->c++;
    (it should be realized my posts are all in a light hearted manner. And should not be taken offense to.)

  7. #7
    Registered User major_small's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    2,787
    I can't see humans losing out to machines/computers any time in the near future... take a look at the thread about the brain vs. computers... a human can adapt alot better than a robot can... I highly doubt there will be a robot comperable to a human anytime too soon...
    Join is in our Unofficial Cprog IRC channel
    Server: irc.phoenixradio.org
    Channel: #Tech


    Team Cprog Folding@Home: Team #43476
    Download it Here
    Detailed Stats Here
    More Detailed Stats
    52 Members so far, are YOU a member?
    Current team score: 1223226 (ranked 374 of 45152)

    The CBoard team is doing better than 99.16% of the other teams
    Top 5 Members: Xterria(518175), pianorain(118517), Bennet(64957), JaWiB(55610), alphaoide(44374)

    Last Updated on: Wed, 30 Aug, 2006 @ 2:30 PM EDT

  8. #8
    i want wookie cookies the Wookie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    455
    Originally posted by Cat
    I also doubt we will soon see the days where machines can replace humans. Machines and men think in very different ways, and even technologies like neural networks can't truly emulate the massively interconnected, asynchronous network of the brain. Machines are superior at many kinds of tasks, but very much inferior at others, and I think that will always be the case.
    I don't think so. Neural networks are basically designed on how the brain works. To me, 30 years sounds reasonable, especially at the current rate of growth for out technology.

    Neural networks are designed to conform and 'learn' from whatever data it gets. And there are plenty of people researching on ways to make this better.

    Machines can't think with emotion, but they can with logic as we do, and they can do that better than we can, if not just as good

  9. #9
    carry on JaWiB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    1,972
    I say just look at the past...People have been predicting stuff like this for years...Ever heard of "2001: A Space Odyssey" ? Maybe it is possible for robots to present a threat to us in the future, but it seems highly unlikely that they will even come close to replacing us...
    "Think not but that I know these things; or think
    I know them not: not therefore am I short
    Of knowing what I ought."
    -John Milton, Paradise Regained (1671)

    "Work hard and it might happen."
    -XSquared

  10. #10
    Registered User major_small's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    2,787
    they may present a threat to us within 30 years, but i don't think it will be anything like the terminator movies predict...

    even if they do come around to present a threat, they won't be able to replicate a human, and I still think a human will always have a capacity to overcome a robot...
    Join is in our Unofficial Cprog IRC channel
    Server: irc.phoenixradio.org
    Channel: #Tech


    Team Cprog Folding@Home: Team #43476
    Download it Here
    Detailed Stats Here
    More Detailed Stats
    52 Members so far, are YOU a member?
    Current team score: 1223226 (ranked 374 of 45152)

    The CBoard team is doing better than 99.16% of the other teams
    Top 5 Members: Xterria(518175), pianorain(118517), Bennet(64957), JaWiB(55610), alphaoide(44374)

    Last Updated on: Wed, 30 Aug, 2006 @ 2:30 PM EDT

  11. #11
    i want wookie cookies the Wookie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    455
    well if you forget everything youve heard/seen in movies.

    machines only do what theyre programmed to do. so itll adapt to whatever there is. but it has no emotion. which can be a good thing and a bad thing.

    and also Cat, building of those machines by other machines would probably be alot more feasable than being built by humans because of the pricision. picutrea a modern chip plant. except it being fully automated and run by software which adapts to dynamic market data to meet supply and demand, without any human feedback at all.

    something like that though

  12. #12
    Banned frenchfry164's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    1,552
    Man, how many times must this topic be brought up on this forum?

  13. #13
    Microsoft. Who? MethodMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    1,198
    >>I think what you need to realize is technology doesn't mean replacing what already exists, but building upon and enhancing what exists

    I didnt read much of this discussion, but happened to see this.

    Id like to disagree with you. People who think like you are why technology doesnt expand, or get enhanced. There could be new methods which are more powerful, but people just want to expand on old techniques. That is a major setback today...
    -MethodMan-

    Your Move:Life is a game, Play it; Life is a challenge, Meet it; Life is an opportunity, capture it.

    Homepage: http://www.freewebs.com/andy_moog/home.html

  14. #14
    mov.w #$1337,D0 Jeremy G's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    704
    Originally posted by MethodMan
    >>I think what you need to realize is technology doesn't mean replacing what already exists, but building upon and enhancing what exists

    I didnt read much of this discussion, but happened to see this.

    Id like to disagree with you. People who think like you are why technology doesnt expand, or get enhanced. There could be new methods which are more powerful, but people just want to expand on old techniques. That is a major setback today...
    I intended to insert "necessarily" and "also" in my state ment to force the point that technology advancement includes enhancement. However, I was in a hurry to get out to my classes.

    As for "people like me" -- you know nothing of or about me.
    As for "major setback" -- Ehancements to existing technology are what are responsible for the LEAPS and BOUNDS technology has made in the past 15 years. The desktop computer thats being put to waste by your use wouldnt be able to play the games you like, or view the websites you surf with out enhancing existing technology.


    tit for tat, personal attack was warranted in that last section.
    c++->visualc++->directx->opengl->c++;
    (it should be realized my posts are all in a light hearted manner. And should not be taken offense to.)

  15. #15
    ___
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    806
    I think they MIGHT make a small threat in the job world. They will never actually replace the human race. That is rediculous. They would probably do as they do today and replace people in factories for faster production and more accurate production. There isn't a soon to be race of robots ready to come whipe out the human race.
    "When I die I want to pass peacefully in my sleep like my grandfather did, not screaming and yelling like the passengers in his car."

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. application of AI in gaming
    By sun and moon in forum General AI Programming
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-04-2007, 11:32 AM
  2. fun with pathfinding
    By BobMcGee123 in forum Game Programming
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 06-15-2006, 02:28 PM
  3. Ai
    By bobthemighty in forum Game Programming
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 05-18-2002, 11:44 PM
  4. Programming Puns
    By kermi3 in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: 03-23-2002, 03:38 PM
  5. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 12-12-2001, 09:28 AM

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21