![]() |
| | #1 |
| Registered User Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 39
| TIA.
__________________ <Signature name="Ruchikar" quote="discussions are forgotten, only code remains"/> |
| Ruchikar is offline |
| | #2 |
| Super Moderator Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,472
| Yes. XP is based on 2000 architecture and only has a small DOS emulator that is extremely limited and will cause a lot of old DOS code multitudes of problems. Loading device drivers for sound output is one area that comes to mind. XP simply will not do this correctly - in my experience.
__________________ If you aim at everything you will hit something but you won't know what it is. |
| Bubba is offline |
| | #3 |
| PC Fixer-Upper Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 2,001
| NT was a DOS emulator box too. How would programming for nt's emulator be any different? The only things i know they would have changed is adding new commands. I doubt they'd redo the entire emulator, xp is still based off nt, 2000 was based off nt. Why do you think the xp version number is an nt number?
__________________ PHP and XML Let's talk about SAX |
| Waldo2k2 is offline |
| | #4 |
| Super Moderator Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,472
| Are you asking me or telling me??
__________________ If you aim at everything you will hit something but you won't know what it is. |
| Bubba is offline |
| | #5 |
| Registered User Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 39
| To clarify a bit more, the application is running in the 16 bit COMMAND.COM emulation shell of VDM. It's *not* running in 32 bit cmd.exe. Do you anticipate any problems if this application is made to run in Windows XP 16 bit COMMAND.COM shell? Perhaps the underlying question is - are there any differences between NT and XP's 16 bit emulation COMMAND.COM shells?
__________________ <Signature name="Ruchikar" quote="discussions are forgotten, only code remains"/> |
| Ruchikar is offline |
| | #6 |
| PC Fixer-Upper Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 2,001
| >>Are you asking me or telling me?? telling i suppose, but im not an MS employee so i don't know for 100%, but im 90+% sure. >>are there any differences between NT and XP's 16 bit emulation COMMAND.COM shells? Well xp is newer, and you'd hope they would have improved 16 bit app support but who knows, i don't forsee any trouble...why don't you just make a dummy app and check it out? Oh yeah btw, I've made some 16 bit apps with open watcom and xp has never had a problem with them thus far.
__________________ PHP and XML Let's talk about SAX |
| Waldo2k2 is offline |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Virtual keys | Arkanos | Windows Programming | 4 | 12-12-2005 10:00 AM |
| dual boot Win XP, win 2000 | Micko | Tech Board | 6 | 05-30-2005 02:55 PM |
| XP Sucks | Darkman | A Brief History of Cprogramming.com | 26 | 01-19-2004 07:54 PM |
| getting to true DOS with windows NT | major_small | A Brief History of Cprogramming.com | 4 | 11-05-2003 05:23 PM |
| FlashWindowEx not declared? | Aidman | Windows Programming | 3 | 05-17-2003 02:58 AM |