That's how i post, i type things off in an irate state of mind, then i read it through while i'm still annoyed and miss loads of stuff, then i read again and remove spelling mistakes and other obvious errors.see you edited your responce of all mistakes so you wouldn't look like a moron while trying to insult me
Right, but its totally irrelevent, my point was merely that eliminating being killed by pointless accidents would not remove death.Ever look at the words following my statement?
Because obviously there is a linear relationship between the complexity of sentences and the amount of time spent considering ideas..... oh wait no no that's wrong again.Really? you don't act like you are thinking things through. Your most complex sentence is an insult. Didn't think about that did you?
You suggested it was acceptable that innocent people were dieing on grounds of population control.When did I ever say we should celebrate death
And obviously "natural" MUST equal good. Oh wait no, it doesn't.And death is the natual way to control overpopulation as I have stated.
We can overide nature, natures solution to overpopulation is an increased death rate our solution is birth control.
Arguing that we should accept premature death on grounds of population control is APAULING.
Yea, but you seem to think it's ok, that we should accept it and not bother trying to stop it.Another example of ignorance. I have already said that I don't celebrate murder. I just look at it in how it actually is.
Oh I see of course, of course, 10 people dying a day that doesn't matter, thats REAL population control, whereas 5000 people dying in one hour ONCE thats just wrong man...Your little ending in the end is just amazing. You go from 10 people in an entire country over the span of 24 hours to 5,000 people in less than an hour in one building. I must say for a super genious that is an amazing example there.
Why does the time frame or geographical location matter one iota?
Why do you care more about the 5000 killed in a one off attack than the same number of children killed in a year and half? Yea cause that makes perfect sense. Maybe the children deserved it more, maybe there lives aren't as important..... right.
Really thought about it?? You make it sound complicated!? This is not exactly rocket science you know.I would have to say that you haven't actually gone through what I have said and really thought about it.
Emotional, i wish more people got emotional, but you see they're just numbers on bits paper or a screen. Why get emotional over numbers. 10 people die a day, oh well a one and a zero, imaginary statistical people, la la la, except there are REAL people behind those numbers with real lives and real families.Instead you have gotten uptight and emotional over what I have said and made conclusions that are wrong. And drop the stupid insults. They are pointless
Oh but its population control, we need murder and manslaughter, because otherwise ummm we'll have too many people and then umm we'll all get wiped by SARS!!!!