Im sure i could because i can see the errors in your stance.I highly doubt you could say anything I haven't said myself. I was once very strongly an atheist. I only saw religion as antithetical to science. But I later came to see how the apparent paradox resolves; the two lines of inquiry are different and complementary. Both are necessary, each complements the other and each is necessary.
But tell me, if i did somehow manage to convince you (hypothetically) that there was no "meaning" would it upset you?
What i want to know, is would you want to know if you were wrong?