Thread: Car stolen near President Bush in SA

  1. #46
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    913
    this will be long.

    You skipped it over, so I reiterate: Dude, those damned homosexuals are trying to get equal rights. Let's squash that with an ammendment.
    sorry, i didnt see it before.

    no one ever said we should kill them all, but no one said its right either.

    we still use marrage as man and women, not a zillion combinations. your given the right to do what you want, but know one said we have to like it or support you(im not trying to imply anything here).

    I await proof.
    every one wants them. if he had the parts, people and the money and thanks to the un years and years dont you think he came up with something? we already know he broke more than enought to go in.

    Tax cuts for the rich
    so you want more taxes? so the people that work for it get punished?

    the lower class cant afford to give away much, know one can blame them. they shouldnt have to.

    a billionare can give millions, but what about the guys in the middle. he will take home something more along the lines of the lower mans, that not right. why should he even bother?

    besides who pays who's paycheck? people are greedy, the ceo still wants his money, even if it comes out of other people wallets.


    allowing more freedom to gun nuts
    the constitution only says right to keep and bare arms.

    they only got us our independaces, saved our lives and been apart of america for a few hundred years.

    besides the fact there are alot of hunters/competition shooters.

    would you like to see cops armed with flowers instead? we dont need a zillion laws. we need a few to be inforced and just a background check.

    take vermont, almost no gun laws, and the crime isnt that bad. only the good guys will hand in their pistols, why disarm them?

    fighting against gay rights
    the law says man and women, were obeying the laws. they should change the deff.

    again, we dont have to support you, we dont haver to like you. its not politicaly correct to say, but thats not what american have thought for centurues. off course some people are going to say no.

    just wondering here, why did you bring that up? anything new in the news?

    I'm sorry, am I the only one seeing things exploding east of me?
    instead of sending the military over should we of had more tea parties? should we worry about making him feel like a bad dictator?

    you can only talk so far. you dont hope for it but you have to admint it eventually. we should of tried to get him to hand it over, but of course he didnt so we went in.

    More like "Mr. Bush, we think you should make a display of trying to attend the tea party, but tragically have to cut the evening short before you bomb thier cities"
    how long to we have to wait? we gave him almost a decade. do you really think any dictator will hand over much? it is more or less for show.

    What does Bush have to do with slavery? You've lost me.
    when i did the "everything changed" part i only mentioned the bad, i figured i shoudl throw in something good.

  2. #47
    Just one more wrong move. -KEN-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    3,227
    >> i figured i shoudl throw in something good.

    So the only good thing you could come up with for the republican party happened that long ago?

    >>we still use marrage as man and women, not a zillion combinations.

    Oh yes, because giving equal rights to same-sex couples would just be HORRID, wouldn't it? I can't BELIEVE that those filfthy beasts would want to be things like "rights" and "benefits". Such nerve. .

    >>the lower class cant afford

    I don't think you understand the concept of tax cuts for the RICH. See, they're like tax cuts. But only for the rich.

    >>again, we dont have to support you, we dont haver to like you. its not politicaly correct to say, but thats not what american have thought for centurues. off course some people are going to say no.<<

    Actually, sexuality only socially became taboo in recent times. That's a whole different debate, though.

    "We don't have to like you" - no, of course not. But giving us the same rights as any other commited couple would be a nice touch.

    >>just wondering here, why did you bring that up? anything new in the news?

    As a matter of fact, you conservative whackjobs are trying to bypass the recent court ruling lifting the ban on sodomy laws by making an AMMENDMENT to the CONSTITUTION banning same-sex marraige.

    >> we should of tried to get him to hand it over, but of course he didnt so we went in.

    I'm not saying it's a bad thing that Saddam is gone. It's great. But we really had no place jumping in there, and "OMG HE MAY HELP TERRISTS!!!" was a scapegoat.

  3. #48
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    913
    So the only good thing you could come up with for the republican party happened that long ago?
    no, the easist change that was for the better and not the worse.

    Oh yes, because giving equal rights to same-sex couples would just be HORRID, wouldn't it? I can't BELIEVE that those filfthy beasts would want to be things like "rights" and "benefits". Such nerve.
    they only affend how many people? the parades are so usefull and a good thing to associate yourself with.

    As a matter of fact, you conservative whackjobs are trying to bypass the recent court ruling lifting the ban on sodomy laws by making an AMMENDMENT to the CONSTITUTION banning same-sex marraige.
    it doesnt sound that great, but i never did look into it.

    the cause isnt that bad but they way these people go about it is part of why no one wants them to win.

    I'm not saying it's a bad thing that Saddam is gone. It's great. But we really had no place jumping in there, and "OMG HE MAY HELP TERRISTS!!!" was a scapegoat.
    we cant argue about that till the stuff is found.

    but we gave him almost a decade dont you think we should of done something? not enough people would support him for doing what the un should do, but terrorism is a concern and something that could happen. he used it like he should of.

  4. #49
    Just one more wrong move. -KEN-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    3,227
    >>we cant argue about that till the stuff is found.

    but we gave him almost a decade dont you think we should of done something? not enough people would support him for doing what the un should do, but terrorism is a concern and something that could happen. he used it like he should of.<<

    I think the point gets lost somewhere along the line. Me? I'm just wondering where Bush grabbed the authority to go do that.

    >>they only affend how many people? the parades are so usefull and a good thing to associate yourself with.

    Really, that's amazingly stupid. Pride parades may be a little over the top, but when you're stifled 364 days of the year, one day where you can kick back and be crazy isn't too much to ask. Also, if you're that bothered, nobody made you watch.

    Another thing...one may draw a parallel between a pride parade and Mardis Gras. Do you hold everyone who particpates in that to some sort of archaic view of debauchery as well?

    and a good thing to associate yourself with

    Yes. Because I chose to be gay. Learn yourself some...well...anything.

    >>the cause isnt that bad but they way these people go about it is part of why no one wants them to win.<<

    Don't want us to win what? The same rights and benefits that you could get if you got married? No, the problem isn't "how we go about it", it's that a majority of the extreme conservative crowd are also a part of the insane bible-thumping crowd. They see it as a direct threat to their religion and way of life, so they're trying to squash it before it gets out of hand, and :gasp: homosexual couples become equal with their heterosexual counterparts. And that would be a shame .

  5. #50
    Just one more wrong move. -KEN-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    3,227
    Oh, meanwhile, here's a fun news article for you:

    Iraq war not about banned weapons: Rumsfeld

    07/09/03: ( CBC New) WASHINGTON-- The United States didn't declare war on Iraq because of evidence of banned weapons, U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld said on Wednesday.

    Rumsfeld said the U.S. declared war because it saw existing evidence of Iraqi arms programs in "a dramatic new light," through the prism of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

    Rumsfeld made the comments in an appearance before the U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee.

    On Tuesday, the White House acknowledged that U.S. President George Bush's claim that Iraq tried to buy uranium from Africa was based on forged information.

    Though Bush justified the invasion to topple former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein largely on his alleged chemical and biological weapons and possible pursuit of nuclear weapons, such arms have not been found in the 10 weeks after the war.

    Congressional committees are evaluating whether the administration may have used faulty or exaggerated intelligence on Iraq's weapons to justify the war.

    Rumsfeld also told the committee that talks were under way to increase NATO involvement in Iraq peacekeeping efforts.

    Written by CBC News Online

    © 2003 Canadian Broadcasting Corporation

  6. #51
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    913
    Me? I'm just wondering where Bush grabbed the authority to go do that.
    authority to do what the un should of done or authority to do it have saying terrorism?

    Also, if you're that bothered, nobody made you watch.
    if you live by one. happen to be on the wrong streat the wrong day.

    no one else could get away with that.

    Do you hold everyone who particpates in that to some sort of archaic view of debauchery as well?
    lol, the amish.

    if most people dont want to see them they shouldn be out there. they can still do what they want to do but not in public.

    Don't want us to win what? The same rights and benefits that you could get if you got married? No, the problem isn't "how we go about it", it's that a majority of the extreme conservative crowd are also a part of the insane bible-thumping crowd. They see it as a direct threat to their religion and way of life, so they're trying to squash it before it gets out of hand, and :gasp: homosexual couples become equal with their heterosexual counterparts. And that would be a shame .
    majority rules.

    we did come here as gays so why would it be american? that doesnt mean it wrong but that doesnt mean its going to be liked.

    this is very subjective stuff.


    Yes. Because I chose to be gay. Learn yourself some...well...anything.
    i was wiondering why tjis kept bing mentioned. there goes they you and govtcheez jokes... o well.



    well im glad that you actually said something instead of complaing, if this was more common there wouldnt be as many problems. its all about image, alot of people destroyed them, thats what it always comes down to.

  7. #52
    Just one more wrong move. -KEN-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    3,227
    >>if you live by one. happen to be on the wrong streat the wrong day.

    There are flyers everywhere before one. You'd have to be immesnely stupid to "stumble" on one by accident.

    >>no one else could get away with that.

    Sure they can. And do. Homosexuals aren't the only ones with parades.

    >>if most people dont want to see them they shouldn be out there. they can still do what they want to do but not in public.<<

    It's not like they're having sex in the street. Consider it a St. Patrick's parade with shorter shorts and tighter shirts .

    >>majority rules.

    More like "........ you, we hate you. And instead of being a government PROTECTING its citizen's rights, lets screw a whole group over."

    >>we did come here as gays so why would it be american?

    That's pretty stupid, too. Following your line of reasoning, we should all still be pilgrims.

    Anyhow, I'm not saying it should be "American". Are you even listening to what I'm saying? Just answer me this: Why would it be so horrible to give same-sex couples the same benefits? Really. Think about it and give me a good answer.

    >> there goes they you and govtcheez jokes... o well.



    >>well im glad that you actually said something instead of complaing, if this was more common there wouldnt be as many problems. its all about image, alot of people destroyed them, thats what it always comes down to.<<

    STOP MAKING WHOLE PARAGRAPHS THAT MAKE NO SENSE WHATOSEVER.

    PS: Read the news article I posted.

  8. #53
    The Earth is not flat. Clyde's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    1,403
    STOP MAKING WHOLE PARAGRAPHS THAT MAKE NO SENSE WHATOSEVER.
    Never gonna happen.

  9. #54
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    2,212
    Hehehe. See how I turned this whole thread into a flame war? I can feel the power.

    If there are WMDs in Iraq, chances are they have a little sticker on the side that reads
    "Dear Sadam, here's a little something to give those damned Iranians. Love from George Bush Senior. P.S. don't invade Kuwait unless you're gonna charge less for the oil".


    And I probably am a pinky. I believe that an ideal society would be Communist (without the dictator factor). But in the same way that I support CND, I know that it will never happen.

  10. #55
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    913
    Hehehe. See how I turned this whole thread into a flame war? I can feel the power.
    lol

    And I probably am a pinky. I believe that an ideal society would be Communist (without the dictator factor). But in the same way that I support CND, I know that it will never happen.
    pinky?! its pinko!

    first time i ever called a person a pinko when they are a real pinko.


    There are flyers everywhere before one. You'd have to be immesnely stupid to "stumble" on one by accident.
    its not exactly fun stuff to follow. besides from the people there not alot of other people would care. why should they?


    Sure they can. And do. Homosexuals aren't the only ones with parades.
    irish people just get drink, they dont but on that kind of "show". after the first one there shoudlnt of been a second(assuming the first one was bad as they normally are now).

    It's not like they're having sex in the street. Consider it a St. Patrick's parade with shorter shorts and tighter shirts .
    it wouldnt be that bad if that was it. it would be great if it a was all gurl too(had to throw that one in, its almost required).

    More like "$$$$ you, we hate you. And instead of being a government PROTECTING its citizen's rights, lets screw a whole group over."
    if a group ........es you off you should.

    if a $$$ is kill there is still a sentence. if a $$$ gets robbed there is still a investigation. you guys just want extras.

    if all of the marrage type laws change eventual a guy witha hamster will try to use it as a tax deduction! it has to end some where.

    im not going either way, but like most people im leaning righ.



    Why would it be so horrible to give same-sex couples the same benefits? Really. Think about it and give me a good answer.
    it wouldnt be that bad, if that was it.

    but what are other people going todo? eventuall some one is just going to try to screw the system. of course the system he have now is completly screw up in most aspects it would make it easier.

    images is the problem. if all use "ultra conservatives" thing of the gay group being bad then nothing will happen. if the groups image is cleaned up something could change.

    maybe we gave you a bad image from the start(we probally did but this started a long time ago), but youu still have to fix it. its how it works.

    its why there are more people leaning to thr right. we will keep a military and not make your company lay you off.

    STOP MAKING WHOLE PARAGRAPHS THAT MAKE NO SENSE WHATOSEVER.
    yeah, i have been going for speed lately...



    i did read that article(i forgot to mention anything).i heard about it before.

    its true. what makes me hope bush doesnt hear crap about it is hes one of the few people that wouldnt of done something. i cant be mad at him, it was for the best.

    but clinton wouldnt have to worry about this, bush will.

  11. #56
    o to be a mod right about now.......
    DrakkenKorin

    Get off my Intarweb!!!!

  12. #57
    Just one more wrong move. -KEN-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    3,227
    Originally posted by DrakkenKorin
    o to be a mod right about now.......
    Quiet now, cherish the moment. It's rare to see stupidity like this in full bloom.

    ::watches on in awe::

  13. #58
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    913
    o to be a mod right about now.......
    now?

    like 3 pages ago that would of been nice, the flame is almost gone now, why bother.....

  14. #59
    Mayor of Awesometown Govtcheez's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    8,823
    Originally posted by mart_man00
    its not exactly fun stuff to follow. besides from the people there not alot of other people would care. why should they?
    They shouldn't. Homosexuality's a really divisive issue, so apparently they do.
    Originally posted by mart_man00
    irish people just get drink, they dont but on that kind of "show". after the first one there shoudlnt of been a second(assuming the first one was bad as they normally are now).
    To the first sentence, you've obviously never been to a bar on St. Patrick's Day. To the second sentence,
    Originally posted by mart_man00
    it wouldnt be that bad if that was it. it would be great if it a was all gurl too(had to throw that one in, its almost required).
    Originally posted by mart_man00
    if a group ........es you off you should.

    if a $$$ is kill there is still a sentence. if a $$$ gets robbed there is still a investigation. you guys just want extras.
    Because you don't like gays, you think they should get screwed by the government? Alright. I don't like Nascar. I propose that 2 Nascar fans shouldn't be married.
    Originally posted by mart_man00
    if all of the marrage type laws change eventual a guy witha hamster will try to use it as a tax deduction! it has to end some where.
    That's the most illogical conclusion you could have drawn from that. It's so completely out of the park bat........ insanely wrong, I won't answer it.
    Originally posted by mart_man00

    im not going either way, but like most people im leaning righ.
    Huh? THE PREVIEW POST BUTTON. USE IT.
    Originally posted by mart_man00

    it wouldnt be that bad, if that was it.

    but what are other people going todo? eventuall some one is just going to try to screw the system. of course the system he have now is completly screw up in most aspects it would make it easier.
    Because straight couples never, ever mess with the system. Explain 1 way it'll make it easier to mess it up.
    Originally posted by mart_man00

    maybe we gave you a bad image from the start(we probally did but this started a long time ago), but youu still have to fix it. its how it works.
    "hay guysz we made a stupid, wrong generalization about you because it's different and we know nothing about you at all, but it's your fault"
    Originally posted by mart_man00

    its why there are more people leaning to thr right. we will keep a military and not make your company lay you off.
    Connect this to the argument at hand in some way. I dare you.

  15. #60
    Just one more wrong move. -KEN-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    3,227
    I just HAD to respond to this:

    >>if a group ........es you off you should.

    Hitler was really ........ed off at those Jews (etc), he certainly had every right in the world to do what he did.

Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. Dynamic copy-constructor...
    By Petike in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-22-2008, 07:10 AM
  2. 1337 bible, Gen 11
    By Paz_Rax in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-20-2005, 09:40 PM
  3. OpenGL coordinates
    By Da-Nuka in forum Game Programming
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-10-2005, 11:26 AM
  4. i really need help here
    By Unregistered in forum C Programming
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-09-2002, 10:47 PM
  5. I need help with an algorithm
    By Unregistered in forum C Programming
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-07-2002, 07:58 PM