this will be long.
sorry, i didnt see it before.You skipped it over, so I reiterate: Dude, those damned homosexuals are trying to get equal rights. Let's squash that with an ammendment.
no one ever said we should kill them all, but no one said its right either.
we still use marrage as man and women, not a zillion combinations. your given the right to do what you want, but know one said we have to like it or support you(im not trying to imply anything here).
every one wants them. if he had the parts, people and the money and thanks to the un years and years dont you think he came up with something? we already know he broke more than enought to go in.I await proof.
so you want more taxes? so the people that work for it get punished?Tax cuts for the rich
the lower class cant afford to give away much, know one can blame them. they shouldnt have to.
a billionare can give millions, but what about the guys in the middle. he will take home something more along the lines of the lower mans, that not right. why should he even bother?
besides who pays who's paycheck? people are greedy, the ceo still wants his money, even if it comes out of other people wallets.
the constitution only says right to keep and bare arms.allowing more freedom to gun nuts
they only got us our independaces, saved our lives and been apart of america for a few hundred years.
besides the fact there are alot of hunters/competition shooters.
would you like to see cops armed with flowers instead? we dont need a zillion laws. we need a few to be inforced and just a background check.
take vermont, almost no gun laws, and the crime isnt that bad. only the good guys will hand in their pistols, why disarm them?
the law says man and women, were obeying the laws. they should change the deff.fighting against gay rights
again, we dont have to support you, we dont haver to like you. its not politicaly correct to say, but thats not what american have thought for centurues. off course some people are going to say no.
just wondering here, why did you bring that up? anything new in the news?
instead of sending the military over should we of had more tea parties? should we worry about making him feel like a bad dictator?I'm sorry, am I the only one seeing things exploding east of me?
you can only talk so far. you dont hope for it but you have to admint it eventually. we should of tried to get him to hand it over, but of course he didnt so we went in.
how long to we have to wait? we gave him almost a decade. do you really think any dictator will hand over much? it is more or less for show.More like "Mr. Bush, we think you should make a display of trying to attend the tea party, but tragically have to cut the evening short before you bomb thier cities"
when i did the "everything changed" part i only mentioned the bad, i figured i shoudl throw in something good.What does Bush have to do with slavery? You've lost me.