whats your party?

This is a discussion on whats your party? within the A Brief History of Cprogramming.com forums, part of the Community Boards category; In Bangladesh the two main political party: Bangladesh Awami League(1973, 1996Jun) : Last time in power 1996-2001. Compared with the ...

  1. #76
    Registered User zahid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    532
    In Bangladesh the two main political party:

    Bangladesh Awami League(1973, 1996Jun):
    Last time in power 1996-2001. Compared with the BNP, it's a very old party. It came in power after immediate independence and win in two National Parliament election.

    Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP)(1979, 1991, 1996 Feb, 2001):
    Now in power, with two third majority in parliament, strongest and biggest victory in BD election history. They win in five National Parliament election.

    Most popular elections: 1990, 1996 Jun, 2001
    Unpopular elections: 1988, 1996 Feb
    Ref: Bangladesh Election Commission, BAL, BNP

    Me??? not ready to disclose here.. actually not that specific to party but the person.
    Last edited by zahid; 05-06-2003 at 10:01 PM.
    [ Never code before desk work ]
    -------------------------------------:-->
    A man who fears Nothing is the man who Loves Nothing
    If you Love Nothing, what joy is there in your life.
    =------------------------------------------------------= - I may be wrong.

  2. #77
    RoD
    RoD is offline
    Redundantly Redundant RoD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    6,331
    All pro-abortionists pull out the "What about rape?" question when they have no other defense for the killing of an innocent baby. So, what about rape? Yes it's a horrible thing, and nobody asks to be raped. Which is worse, a poor woman having a harder time in life because she has a child(which she could put up for adoption), or an innocent baby being killed simply because it isn't wanted? All people deserve a chance at life, no matter what their mother thinks. Everybody tries to justify it by saying that a fetus is not really a human being. If you take an arbitrary cell and you put it into a womans womb, what would happen? Nothing. If you took an egg that was has been fertilized just one second ago and put it in a womans womb, what would happen? A human being would develop. So clearly there is a direct connection between the fertilization of an egg and human life. Saying that a fetus is not a human being is just a lame excuse.
    Of course we mention rape! Its a very valid argument. The adoption agencies and such are already over crowded and you want to add to these problems because some $$$$$$$ stuck his dick where it didnt belong and u took away her choice of having a child?? Thats ludacris dude.

    You sound very certain a human would develop. Ok lets say it does, but has mental problems. So now you have a mentally disabled orphan in an over crowded adoption system in poor conditions and having a lack of attention leading to more complications. Yea thats a great $$$$ing idea, lets veto abortion right now!!!

    Yes a fetus is a human. So $$$$ing what? In non consensual situations the female has the right to say what happens to her body. That fetus is part of her body ie her property, who the hell are you to make her have this child???

    What if pregnancy poses a health risk? So she has to risk death because she was raped??? Thats totally lame man.

    What's the difference? You're just trying to make it sound better.
    Theres a huge difference. You can be for abortion or the right of choice. Maybe i dont believe in the abortion process, but i believe that woman has the right to chose.

    Do you really believe that a woman and a woman alone has the right to decide whether a baby lives or dies?
    100%. Her body is her property, PERIOD dude, PERIOD.

  3. #78
    the hat of redundancy hat nvoigt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Hannover, Germany
    Posts
    3,139
    I never said the Jews could have defeated the German army. At least they would have had a chance to defend themselves though. What's so funny about it? If just half of the Jews had firearms, do you really think so many of them would have been tortured and killed in the concentration camps?
    No, they would have been shot, maimed, burned alive and the survivors would have been tortured and killed in concentration camps. They did it in the resistance of the Warsaw Ghetto. Sadly, your argument has already been proven wrong by history.
    hth
    -nv

    She was so Blonde, she spent 20 minutes looking at the orange juice can because it said "Concentrate."

    When in doubt, read the FAQ.
    Then ask a smart question.

  4. #79
    The Earth is not flat. Clyde's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    1,420
    " Everybody tries to justify it by saying that a fetus is not really a human being. "

    It's not.

    "If you take an arbitrary cell and you put it into a womans womb, what would happen? Nothing."

    Right...... and?

    "If you took an egg that was has been fertilized just one second ago and put it in a womans womb, what would happen? A human being would develop."

    Assuming for the moment that all the zillions of different chemical and physiological changes occur correctly (half the number of pregnancies self-abort) ok.... and the conclusion is....

    "So clearly there is a direct connection between the fertilization of an egg and human life."

    LOL, who would have guessed?

    "Saying that a fetus is not a human being is just a lame excuse."

    No, saying a foetus is not a human being is using your brain:

    Let me rewite your nonsense into a coherent albeit flawed argument:

    'Once an egg is fertilised a human being will be born, by killing the growing ball of cells you are stopping that process hence preventing our human being coming into the world hence killing that human being, hence abortion is murder.'

    Its the 'potential' argument, potentially a human being would exist, and preventing that potential being realised is the same as killing the human being..... well of course its utter nonsense because taken to its logical conclusion you, me, everyone in the entire world is a murderer because there are plenty of potential children we could all have had, that we haven't, are we all murderers then?

    Nothing magic happens upon fertilisation, chemical changes occur, the child is no less of a potential child than 10 minutes before the parents started having sex.

    Prevention of the formation of a human life is NOT THE SAME as killing a human being.

    When an abortion is carried out you kill a ball of cells, thats it.
    Last edited by Clyde; 05-07-2003 at 07:04 AM.

  5. #80
    The Earth is not flat. Clyde's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    1,420
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    and guess what the West is to blame for much of them.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    "what the .......... is that. every time, its always americas fault. were the only ones that every get off our a$$es! wow, we helped get countries independance. we helped get rif of tyrants. we gave out $hit loads of money, we never even think if they disserve it or not (cause of the people). if we didnt get involved we would get b*tched at, if we do get involved its imperialism."

    Done any history? Anyone who doesn't think that the 3rd world has been screwed over by the WEST (no, *gasp* not just the US), is ignorant, plain and simple.

  6. #81
    Mayor of Awesometown Govtcheez's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    8,825
    > As I said before, the founding fathers believed in God and attributed our success as a nation, along with the well-being of all things, to God.

    Bzzzt - wrong. The founding fathers were largely deists, not Christians.

    > "Which law are you talking about?"

    What, you actually wanted me to find the specific law? Google broken for you or something? It was added in 1954 by an act of Congress after campaigning by the KoC. That was 62 years after the original pledge was written. Look it up yourself, you lazy bastard.

    > you won't be punished

    Wrong again - if a child in school feels strongly enough about it that they won't recite the pledge, then they'll be punished. Thats' what the whole argument's about.

    > do you know why?

    Because the Germans were better organized, more numerous, and oh yeah - were trained soldiers? The resistance did have guns.

    The abortion issue's been covered.

  7. #82
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    913
    that another thing i hate, people forget that the constitiion mean that they can do what they want, it doesnt mean the government has to help out.

    everything work alot better when the people werent so radical. would you prefere us to still be a colony? whats with all the PC crap.

    its changing history. it gets worst everytime.

  8. #83
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    913
    i forgot about a couple posts

    You sound very certain a human would develop. Ok lets say it does, but has mental problems. So now you have a mentally disabled orphan in an over crowded adoption system in poor conditions and having a lack of attention leading to more complications. Yea thats a great $$$$ing idea, lets veto abortion right now!!!
    where does it end? it does have blue eyes, lets kill it.

    Done any history? Anyone who doesn't think that the 3rd world has been screwed over by the WEST (no, *gasp* not just the US), is ignorant, plain and simple.
    fine, name some events/times....and dont give me that salvery stuff, it was going on before. even when we were still in europe.

  9. #84
    ¡Amo fútbol!
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    2,136
    Originally posted by mart_man00
    fine, name some events/times....and dont give me that salvery stuff, it was going on before. even when we were still in europe.
    Yeah, since everyone else does it too, it's not our fault.

    How recent of an example do you want? How about when we made a false promise to the Iraqi's that we would back their resistance effort against Sadamm after the Gulf War?

  10. #85
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    913
    Yeah, since everyone else does it too, it's not our fault
    half of the time when its mention were the only ones mentioned for doing it. it doesnt make it right but everytime we get signaled out.

    How about when we made a false promise to the Iraqi's that we would back their resistance effort against Sadamm after the Gulf War?
    yeah, whos fault was that. while i cant remember that(i was probally in like 1st grade) i bet it was kind of like this war. we had some people that wanted to quickly do the right thing and get rif og sadamm(generally speaking republicans, but of course plenty od exceptions) and then we have the cowards(generally speaking democrats and liberals). if it was done the american no one would be complaing(well, theres always been the anti-americans, recently they came into america).

  11. #86
    ¡Amo fútbol!
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    2,136
    Originally posted by mart_man00
    half of the time when its mention were the only ones mentioned for doing it. it doesnt make it right but everytime we get signaled out.
    When you are the top dog, you are expected to act better.


    Originally posted by mart_man00
    yeah, whos fault was that. while i cant remember that(i was probally in like 1st grade) i bet it was kind of like this war. we had some people that wanted to quickly do the right thing and get rif og sadamm(generally speaking republicans, but of course plenty od exceptions) and then we have the cowards(generally speaking democrats and liberals). if it was done the american no one would be complaing(well, theres always been the anti-americans, recently they came into america).
    Yes. democrats=cowards and republicans=big heroes

    * 1000000000

  12. #87
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    913
    yeah pretty much now adays.

    it not like any one can seriusly say things like that, but more and more it getting more truth to it.

    When you are the top dog, you are expected to act better.
    cant really argue with that one.....

Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst 123456
Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. Swedish Pirate (as in, comp) Party wins seats in Brussels!
    By MK27 in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 06-11-2009, 10:01 AM
  2. First party tracking cookies Meow!
    By kryptkat in forum Tech Board
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 08-12-2006, 06:29 PM
  3. Lan Party
    By RoD in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 10-14-2002, 05:14 PM
  4. Party question
    By Barjor in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-18-2002, 02:39 PM

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21