Follow Iraq, North Korea trying to mess the World.

This is a discussion on Follow Iraq, North Korea trying to mess the World. within the A Brief History of Cprogramming.com forums, part of the Community Boards category; Do you guys think that North Korea tactically jump in to play World political game at the same time with ...

  1. #1
    KingoftheWorld
    Guest

    Follow Iraq, North Korea trying to mess the World.

    Do you guys think that North Korea tactically jump in to play World political game at the same time with Iraq to mess up the
    Whole World?
    To me, North Korea is big liar to Nuclear program Pact agreement.
    and North Korea is trying to create new tension in order to draw attention and the issue of massive destruction away over Iraq.
    North Korea has been waiting tactically to mess up the World in right time.I hope US and the UN don't care about this country at this moment and let focus on peaceful resolving the problem over Iraq first. What do you think?

    KingoftheWorld

  2. #2
    Refugee face_master's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    2,052
    Its the perfect time for the North Koreans. Its harder to fight 2 countries at once.

  3. #3
    Registered User Aran's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    1,301
    oh no, Korea has nukes,i'm shaking in my boots.

    anyone heard of SDI?

    pah.

  4. #4
    Registered User Commander's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    804
    is it just me or NK is the only country that actually figured out that BD was just a bluff?
    oh i'm sorry! i didn;t realize my fist was rushing to meet ur face!

    MSN :: commander_android@hotmail.com []*[]

  5. #5
    Climber spoon_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    ATL
    Posts
    182
    Yep, you guys are right. North Korea has had perfect timing. However, we ARE going to war with Iraq, like it or not. It might just be the United States and Britain, but we are going to oust Saddam (use your own definition of oust, I prefer 'kill').

    North Korea, if they continue this henious activity, will be dealt with on a global level. This will be World War III, and North Korea will be the target.

    If North Korea gets crazy, and the U.N. does not approve a strike, then the world is going to be really messed up.


    spoon_

    GO FALCONS! (I hate Eagles fans, idiots)

    [edit]
    btw, if we strike North Korea, I bet that nuclear reactor they are in the process of activating will be the first target. 10 bucks says so.
    [/edit]
    {RTFM, KISS}

  6. #6
    It's full of stars adrianxw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    4,831
    I'm kind of expecting an "accident" nudge-nudge wink-wink to happen at their reactor.
    Wave upon wave of demented avengers march cheerfully out of obscurity unto the dream.

  7. #7
    Registered User Scourfish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    397
    Well, given that North Korea just had a diplomat host a surprise meeting to discuss the matter, I think not.

    Kim Jong-ill is not a stupid person, and I highly doubt he would ruthlessly try to nuke the United States; plus, the taepo dong missile system could not get farther than Japan anyway. On top of that, it would take them over a year to harvest enough military grade plutoniom from nuclear waste to make one bomb.

    North Korea is a starving Nation and they are looking for one major thing: kickbacks.

    I'm not too worried about North Korea; I'd just like to see the 20 suitcase bombs accounted for.

  8. #8
    It's full of stars adrianxw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    4,831
    >>> it would take them over a year to harvest enough military grade plutoniom

    In this article, the CIA suggest they already have harvested enough to make two bombs...

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asi...ic/2572525.stm

    ...on the other hand...

    >>> North Korea is a starving Nation and they are looking for one major thing: kickbacks.

    ... that is certainly true.
    Wave upon wave of demented avengers march cheerfully out of obscurity unto the dream.

  9. #9
    Its not rocket science vasanth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    1,683
    Well all this would not have happened if the US had not stoped the oil supply to north korea.....

  10. #10
    Funniest man in this seat minesweeper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    801
    >>anyone heard of SDI?<<

    Yeah, Space Defence Initiative, but as far as I knew it never got built. Politics between the US and Russia meant it got put on the shelf.

    >>This will be World War III<<

    I really hope not, wasn't it Einstein who said:

    "I do not know with what weapons World War 3 will be fought, but World War 4 will be fought with sticks and stones"? Sounds eerily true to me.

  11. #11
    Registered User Zeeshan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Munich, Germany
    Posts
    224

    Who the hell do you think you are ?

    I really don't get all this tension stuff at all. Only the US is responsible for all that's happening.

    1. America has no right what-so-ever to stop other countries of the world for making nukes or missiles. It can't even blame anyone for doing such a thing. The GREATEST threat to the world is america's nuclear program, not anyone elses'. Remember that uptill now only America has ruthlessly used two atom bombs (on Japan) and killed millions of people. The credit for starting a multi-national Nuclear and ballistic missiles race also goes to the US, coz they started it all.

    2. Iraq is complying with the UN and letting the inspectors visit every place of their interest. It even agreed to let CIA into the country and do all the investigation they want to do. Yet, America has not stopped spreading it's war syndrome. It PROVES that America has some other intentions in doing so, cause now there's no sense in attacking IRAQ, when it has nothing to hide.

    3. America threatens IRAQ, saying, "WE WILL NUKE YOU". Isn't this bare aggression and terrorism? Does it make any sense in attacking IRAQ with the logic that they "might" attack America, when there is no such indication?

    4. If America does attack IRAQ (which is not at all doubtfull), what will be the consequences? Other countries will also start nuclear programs, to defend themselves for any future American aggression. IMO, America's the only one responsible for starting nuclear arms race among China, Pakistan, India, North Korea, Iran, Iraq, Israel and so on.

  12. #12
    Funniest man in this seat minesweeper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    801
    Here we go again

  13. #13
    ....
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Groningen (NL)
    Posts
    2,386
    First, I don't like the current US politics, I don't like war at all. The citizens of Iraq have suffered so much under the regime of Saddam Hussein, under the wars (Iran, Gulf War), and under the sanctions of the UN. And now they should go into another war?

    > It PROVES that America has some other intentions in doing so

    Ofcourse it is not only the weapons. Saddam and his regime must be removed. The problem is that if you only kill Saddam, probably one of his followers will take Saddam's place and then still the people of Iraq are not freed from the regime.

    > If America does attack IRAQ (which is not at all doubtfull), what
    > will be the consequences?

    A lot of people from Iraq will fly to other countries to find a safe place where they will not be bombed. They will fly to the countries around them and farther. In Europe there currently are a lot of people who fled from wars, hunger and other things.

    Another consequence will probably be that the people in Arab countries will attack people from western world. I've read that western soldiers in Afghanistan will not be safe when Iraq will be attacked. I also read that if Iraq will be attacked, terrorists in the western world will get active.

    There are probably a lot more things, world politics is very complex.

    I wonder if attacking Iraq will really help eliminating terrorism. In my opinion it will spread terrorism around the world more than ever.


    "An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind"
    - Mahatma Gandhi

  14. #14
    Registered User Zeeshan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Munich, Germany
    Posts
    224
    >> Ofcourse it is not only the weapons. Saddam and his regime must be removed.

    America has no right to do that, atleast not without the UN's approval.

  15. #15
    It's full of stars adrianxw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    4,831
    Zeeshan:

    Do you believe that Adolf Hitler and his regime, should have been left to get on with his religious genocidal attrocities? If so, why? If not, also, why?

    To everyone:

    If we can discuss this rationally, then fine. If the thread gets nasty or goes off into lala land, I'll delete it.
    Wave upon wave of demented avengers march cheerfully out of obscurity unto the dream.

Page 1 of 6 123456 LastLast
Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. Obfuscated Code Contest: The Results
    By Stack Overflow in forum Contests Board
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 02-18-2005, 04:39 PM
  2. Converting from Screen to World Coordinates
    By DavidP in forum Game Programming
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 05-11-2004, 12:51 PM
  3. Too much to ask ?
    By deflamol in forum C Programming
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-06-2004, 04:30 PM
  4. Painfully true but funny...
    By shaik786 in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-01-2003, 02:39 PM
  5. War with Iraq - Read this article if you're interested
    By Davros in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-25-2003, 11:10 PM

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21