"Which is it: is man one of God's blunders, or is God one of man's blunders?"
I can not accept that some of the bible is fact and other bits fiction. Either it is a work created by men with gods inspiration (ie without iterference of mans perceptions) or it is totaly distorted by man interpreting the words of god.
One of the things that plauged me (not counting stupid pieces of the bible like john 2:2 where because children are teasing someone for being bald, god sends a couple of bears and kills 42 of them) is the whole creation v evolution bit.
God created man in his image and all the flora and fauna at the roughly the same time, right?
So dinasaurs and dogs were made at the same time. Right?
We did not evolve into modern man as evolution would be correct and we would no longer be in gods image. How can you improve on gods divine creation? Right?
This must mean Adam and Eve looked like us (as we are both in gods image) right?
So why don't we find remains of modern man with those of primitive man? We must have coexisted.
Shouldn't there be some fosil evidence?
Or did god have to experiment with primitive man to get us in his likeness. In which case he is not omnipotent.
Have I missed something?
Going bad 5....6........7................