![]() |
| | #1 |
| l'Anziano Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,630
| Only this time hanging around in la-la land brought me one of the most amazing discoveries in human history. I call the things which I discovered that day, the Davidian Laws of Girls. Now dont take me wrong, these are not simple "do this" and "dont do this". These are mathematical equations that are guaranteed to tell you whether a girl is good looking or not (excluding facial features). Notice I did not mention anything about personality. The Davidian Laws only apply to external features, as internal features are much more your own opinion and cannot be figured out mathematically. So anyways, with no further adieu, I give you the Davidian Laws of Girls: Equation #1: H = 2s + h - w In this equation, "H" is the total hotness of the girl. "s" is the "slope" of the girl, "h" is her height (measured in feet), and "w" is her width (measured in feet). Equation #2: H = s1 + s2 + h - w In this equation, there are two different "slope" variables, rather than just one. "s1" is the upper slope, and "s2" is the lower slope. Both equations work just the same. In equation 1, "s" is the overall slope, while in equation 2, the upper slope and lower slope are seperated into 2 variables. Now, there is something you must know before you go off and start doing your calculations. Here is how you find slope: 0 = flat 1 = small 2 = pretty good 3 = oh my gosh thats perfect 2 = a bit too big 1 = too big 0 = oh my gosh thats enormous Notice the scale is from 0 to 3, and then from 3 to 0 going back down again. Now that you have the scale for determining slope, lets do a couple test examples. I will use equation 1 for all examples: Girl A: height = 5 ft. 6 in. width = 1 ft. slope = 2.5 H = 2 ( 2.5 ) + 5.5 - 1 H = 5 + 5.5 - 1 H = 10.5 - 1 H = 9.5 That girl has a hotness rating of 9.5 on a scale of 1 to 10. Girl B: height = 5 ft. 4 in. width = 2 ft. slope = 0 H = 2 ( 0 ) + 5.333 - 2 H = 0 + 5.333 - 2 H = 5.333 - 2 H = 3.3 The hotness rating for that girl is 3.3. Finally: Girl C: height = 5 ft. 4 in. width = 1 ft. slope = 1.5 H = 2 ( 1.5 ) + 5.333 - 1 H = 3 + 5.333 - 1 H = 8.333 - 1 H = 7.333 So the hotness rating of that girl is a 7.333. Well, that is the whole synopsis of my Davidian Laws of Girls equations. Now next time you pass a girl, think of my equation, implement it, and find out her rating on a scale of 1 to 10. Try it, it works. (The Davidian Laws of Girls are patented by me. So dont try and steal them! *looks around inspecting everybody...looking for people who want to steal David's precious discoveries* My discoveries! Mine!) |
| DavidP is offline |
| | #2 |
| Green Member Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 892
| LOL! So err let's see: height = 7 feet width = 6 inches slope = 2 hotness = 4 + 7 - 0.5 = 10.5 out of 10! So this barbershop pole would get 10.5 eh? Okay, how bout for supermodels: height = 6 feet width = 1 feet slope = 3 hotness = 6 + 6 - 1 = 11 out of 10?? EDIT - btw, some girls have incredible bodies but are ugly as hell
__________________ Try not. Do or do not. There is no try. - Master Yoda |
| Cshot is offline |
| | #3 |
| Lead Moderator Join Date: Aug 1998
Posts: 2,574
| Wow that makes everything so clear.... However I would change the equations slightly to: H = s1 + s2 + h - w + .25 because first of all girls start off in the positive because they are girls, and secondly: h= 6' 6" s = 2.5 w = 1 as a 10? That's just too thin for me thank you. Little bit wider in that case would be ok.... |
| kermi3 is offline |
| | #4 |
| l'Anziano Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,630
| ah yes i forgot to mention that some extremely hot girls might go a little off of the scale thats understandable, right? and the equation only works on girls, not on barbershop poles...hahahahaha |
| DavidP is offline |
| | #5 |
| Green Member Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 892
| Here's a more accurate way to get a 1-10 rating. Post the pic on hotornot. Wait awhile, and you shall see the rating. Or just send me the pic and I will give the most accurate rating of all
__________________ Try not. Do or do not. There is no try. - Master Yoda |
| Cshot is offline |
| | #6 |
| l'Anziano Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,630
| hey hey hey now! dont try and circumvent my mathematical laws! |
| DavidP is offline |
| | #7 | |
| Microsoft. Who? Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,198
| Quote:
__________________ -MethodMan- Your Move:Life is a game, Play it; Life is a challenge, Meet it; Life is an opportunity, capture it. Homepage: http://www.freewebs.com/andy_moog/home.html | |
| MethodMan is offline |
| | #8 |
| Green Member Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 892
| Reminds me of a buddy of mine back in college. We would walk to class and he'd urge me to walk faster everytime he saw a hot chick. We'd get in front of the girl and he'd turn and look. He turns away saying he wish he hadn't seen that. I would always be like, why did you make me walk faster!
__________________ Try not. Do or do not. There is no try. - Master Yoda |
| Cshot is offline |
| | #9 | ||
| l'Anziano Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,630
| Quote:
Quote:
| ||
| DavidP is offline |
| | #10 |
| Green Member Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 892
| Actually there is a mathematical formula which determines a person's attractiveness. I forgot which article I read it from. But a person's attractiveness is due to the proportion of size and distance of certain features. They found that people with ratios close to the golden ratio have aesthetically pleasing looks. Looks like you weren't the only one whose thought about this
__________________ Try not. Do or do not. There is no try. - Master Yoda |
| Cshot is offline |
| | #11 |
| Just one more wrong move. Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,232
| So you tuned out math for...more math?! At least when I tune out math, I pass out.
__________________ Gays can't love like real people entropysink.com -- because arses weren't designed for running websites. |
| -KEN- is offline |
| | #12 |
| Lead Moderator Join Date: Aug 1998
Posts: 2,574
| If certain proportions on the body are close to the "golden proportion" (1:1.68 i think) http://tlc.discovery.com/convergence...cles/mask.html |
| kermi3 is offline |
| | #13 |
| Green Member Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 892
| With those ratios, no wonder you're not as pretty as me ![]() hehe, it's 1:1.618
__________________ Try not. Do or do not. There is no try. - Master Yoda |
| Cshot is offline |
| | #14 |
| Badly Drawn Boy Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 1,201
| "Davidian?" Do you have a compound out there in Texas, too?
__________________ Staying away from General. |
| ethic is offline |
| | #15 |
| l'Anziano Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,630
| >Looks like you weren't the only one whose thought about this No!!! Burn their findings! Sack their office buildings! Destroy their labs! Those scientific mathematical equations are mine! *goes mad* (Copyright DavidP 2002) |
| DavidP is offline |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Girls are crazy | nickname_changed | A Brief History of Cprogramming.com | 46 | 03-08-2005 08:27 PM |
| Mathematical Proof That Girls Are Evil | sean | A Brief History of Cprogramming.com | 18 | 05-11-2002 12:54 PM |
| I love girls! | mithrandir | A Brief History of Cprogramming.com | 13 | 09-08-2001 08:34 PM |