>>There is no better proven historical document than the Bible.
ok, give me some books that can proove your point.
historical document is a document that if we compare it with
another document of the same time period we will find that
tha facts mentioned in one book are also mentioned in the other.
and so we can say that these facts are true and they really
happened that time, and that it is not from the imagination
of a person smoking ...what ever he was smoking.
also the bible has some chapters that was written with 50
(more or less) years later or sooner from other chapters of the
no, the bible is not a historical document.