Neverending matter?

This is a discussion on Neverending matter? within the A Brief History of Cprogramming.com forums, part of the Community Boards category; >the universe is collapsing in on itself, thusly its not infinite.< What exactly do you mean by the universe? Do ...

  1. #16
    Disagreeably Disagreeable
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    711
    >the universe is collapsing in on itself, thusly its not infinite.<

    What exactly do you mean by the universe? Do you mean the vacuum that all matter exists in? If you do, then I think the universe 's size is infinte. The amount of matter in the universe might be a different story though...

  2. #17
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    267
    Some believe the universe is collapsing, some believe it's expanding... some say that the universe has a cyclidic property... it expands (in perhaps something like the big bang theory), then eventually it re-collapses on itself recycling all of the matter and energy into it's most compact form... then it eventually expands (bang!) and re-creates all of the matter and energy, and so on in a cycle....

    time is relative... this is an important concept to keep in mind.... here on earth to us, this cycle takes trillions of years.... but in some other timeframe the cycle could be as quick as the cycle of your computer... it's all relative to what you're refering time to..

    time, speed, distance... all relative, very cool to think about... especially Einstien's theorys....


    btw: I don't quite believe that whole cycle thing, it's just an idea... never hurts to throw ideas at people, it sparks some good, healthy, open-minded thinking

  3. #18
    ¡Amo fútbol!
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    2,136
    Originally posted by Dual-Catfish
    Matter is not being destroyed in an A-Bomb, it's being converted into energy. e = mc**2.

    We have ways of converting energy to matter... rather, plants do. It's called photosynthesis.

    The universe IS currently expanding. One theory is that the expansion will eventually slow down, and be pulled back into a central point. Afterwards, another big bang will occour... ad infinitum.
    That's is what I meant. It was just a bad explanation.

  4. #19
    _B-L-U-E_ Betazep's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    1,412
    Perhaps space is a mobius strip. It has a real form but if you are on it, there is no end.

    A mobius strip is an example of a finite object that has infinite possibilities. So I do not think everything is as crystal clear as it may be. (circular logic)
    Blue

  5. #20
    Registered User Commander's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    804
    if the universe is infinite, what happens when u get to the "end", which dosen't exists if the universe is infinite, but how can that be? there's gotta be an end to things right? or am i wrong?
    oh i'm sorry! i didn;t realize my fist was rushing to meet ur face!

    MSN :: commander_android@hotmail.com []*[]

  6. #21
    Disagreeably Disagreeable
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    711
    >there's gotta be an end to things right? or am i wrong?<

    I'd humbly say you're wrong. Is there an end to infinty? No. Is there an end to the decimal system? No.

    It makes sense to me that the universe (as in the space that everything is contained within) is of infinite size. If the big bang theory is true (which I don't beleive in) then I think the amount of matter contained within the universe is constantly growing, and is therefore infinite.

    Of course, these are only my uneducated opinions.

  7. #22
    Its not rocket science vasanth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    1,683
    If the universe in expanding or coloapsing then what is beyond the universe.. It cannot be a thick wall ofcource.. Even is it is an obstacle what is behind the obstacle.. and what is behind it.... So i think our human brains cannot comrehend all this..

  8. #23
    ¡Amo fútbol!
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    2,136
    One of my friends was saying this to me. He said that space has to be infinite. If it isn't, it has to be contained in something. And therefore, the container of space is infinite, or the container of the container is infinite. Do you catch my drift?

  9. #24
    Disagreeably Disagreeable
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    711
    >One of my friends was saying this to me. He said that space has to be infinite. If it isn't, it has to be contained in something. And therefore, the container of space is infinite, or the container of the container is infinite. Do you catch my drift?<

    Exactly. That's what I was getting at. When I said that the amount of matter is expanding, I meant the stuff that is in the infintely large space.

    >If the universe in expanding or coloapsing then what is beyond the universe.. It cannot be a thick wall ofcource.. Even is it is an obstacle what is behind the obstacle.. and what is behind it....<

    See my above post and this one as well.

  10. #25
    Peace
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    1,510
    >>the amount of matter contained within the universe is constantly growing

    Not likely. The matter may be expanding but that doesnt make it infinite. The actual amount of matter would remain unchanged.


    >> He said that space has to be infinite. If it isn't, it has to be contained in something.

    Did nobody listen to Betazep? The Mobius Strip concept is one i've toyed with for years. Though only a theoretical representation, it provides an interesting concept none the less.

    >>Of course, these are only my uneducated opinions.

    Just think of it this way: In the practically limitless possible number of things to know in the universe, the difference between what you know, and what any leading scientist on the matter knows, is so infintesimal it is practically none. ...
    "There's always another way"
    -lightatdawn (lightatdawn.cprogramming.com)

  11. #26
    Has a Masters in B.S.
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    2,267
    >when such big differences exist, that's because of error. Not because of estimatio

    first as i said it depends on who you ask i've seen a great many of scientists lately say its collapsing, a lot seem to believe this "conflicts with the Big Bang Theory and evolution in general so its hush hush, i don't really see it from that view.

    >what is it then?

    SHHHHHH!!!! your not supposed to notice. i use what suits my needs.

    >
    Just think of it this way: In the practically limitless possible number of things to know in the universe, the difference between what you know, and what any leading scientist on the matter knows, is so infintesimal it is practically none. ...
    <

    you know your not supposed to say such thing LAD.heh
    ADVISORY: This users posts are rated CP-MA, for Mature Audiences only.

  12. #27
    Peace
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    1,510
    >>you know your not supposed to say such thing LAD

    Well? Think about it, its true.
    "There's always another way"
    -lightatdawn (lightatdawn.cprogramming.com)

  13. #28
    Disagreeably Disagreeable
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    711
    >The actual amount of matter would remain unchanged.<

    When I say that the amount of matter is constantly growing, I mean that the big bang is still happening. Think of it like a nuclear bomb going off. The "wave" is the points in the universe where matter is being created. The middle of the universe has been created and may appear finite to us, but the edges are newly born.

    I don't base that on anything but pure sleep-deprived imagination, though.

    >Well? Think about it, its true.<

    I wouldn't be telling certain someones that around here...

  14. #29
    Peace
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    1,510
    >>The "wave" is the points in the universe where matter is being created.

    The theory states that all matter existed prior to the expansion, it was merely all in one incredibly small point. I'm not aware of a theory on the continued creation of matter. The expansion theory is simply stating that the existing matter is still moving out (expanding) from the central point.

    The problem is that though we are obviously able to see the begining of the universe, we are not able to see the end (or farthest point) of it...
    "There's always another way"
    -lightatdawn (lightatdawn.cprogramming.com)

  15. #30
    Has a Masters in B.S.
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    2,267
    >The problem is that though we are obviously able to see the begining
    of the universe,

    not so fast there grand-pa.

    people have become so accustomed to believing whateve B.S. scientists spew at them that they don't stop to think about it.

    the "Big Bang" theory or any other non creationist theory leaves out one small point! THE BEGINNING. where did the matter or energy or anything come from to cause the bang?!!?!!!?!?!?!?!! um um huh... uh what.... you got any gum?... uh uh... you cookin beans?

    so anyways my point is the "Big Bang" has a "Big" hole! where di dthe bang come from!!!!!??!??!
    ADVISORY: This users posts are rated CP-MA, for Mature Audiences only.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-16-2007, 06:59 PM
  2. Does it matter what gluLookat's center value is?
    By indigo0086 in forum Game Programming
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-07-2007, 10:57 AM
  3. neverending loop
    By bazzano in forum C Programming
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-19-2005, 09:29 AM
  4. it doesn't matter :D
    By Carlos in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-20-2003, 07:53 AM
  5. no matter what
    By GanglyLamb in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 02-09-2003, 11:40 PM

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21