The genes are pretty uninteresting. Our brain is very dynamic, so it's possible for the beliefs inside to change without the need for a change of the genes. And the change of the beliefs are in fact physical changes in the brain.
We improve techonologically, but our GENES have remained virtually unchanged for the thouands of years. The physical structure of our brain is SOLEY determined by our genes.
The changing society is obviously a result of the changing human nature.
Society does change, human nature does not.
With understanding and intelligence there is no need to do dangerous things, and there is no need for fear.
Nonsense again, fear is an advantage to all animals without it you are more-likely to do incredably dangerous things and hence more likely to die.
You underestimate the ability for humans to rapidly change, if one set a goal, he can be entirely "reprogrammed", so to speak, in just a few years.
What drivel, EVEN IF fear did not convey an advantage (which it does) it would take HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of years for humans to lose it.
I'm not saying that it would work, nor happen today, but in the future.
The situations for when emotions are invoked can be observed with intelligence, and the human brain can be drasticly changed with this knowledge. To no longer be controlled with instincts.
There are no external lies. Lies exists internally in an individual.
And internal lies? As opposed to what? External ones!?
They were more "robot-like" than the average person.
Of course there is room for emotions when understanding the physical laws!!! What a rediculous statement, what do you think Einstein, Newton, Darwin were all robots!?
Emotions is one way to control life.
I cannot invisage any way that mankind or any other form of complex life could exist without emotions, furthermore man-kind would could never evolve into a species that existed without emotions even if such a species were possible (which it so isn't anyway)
Do you really think that evolution came up with the one and only possible complex type of life there is (emotion based)? Of course there are other solutions, and other methods to control life.
A person who is trying to be one the world, thus without following his own subjective emotions just to feel good.
"But they're all seeking answers, most of them in their own dream-worlds maybe"
Are you really against me regarding all I say? It's likely that lies are involved if you're instinctively just having the opposite views about all I say.
And they include objects in the physical world, such as humans. To apply such a concept (love) at human-objects, has to be just as much of a lie as a to apply a religon at a world.
"for example love or happiness, and you should realize that they doesn't exist in the physical world outside either."
They don't exist in the physical world? Of course they don't exist in the physical world! They aren't objects you know! They are sensations, that's all.
Knowledge of the result, instead of fear.
Series there is also a slight problem in your logic, as fear makes civilized society possible. If one did don't have fear of consciences, what would prevent them from doing something