Linux has many components, windows is all-in-one?

This is a discussion on Linux has many components, windows is all-in-one? within the A Brief History of Cprogramming.com forums, part of the Community Boards category; Hi, You know how Linux is made up of many bits and componets combined together to make it a full ...

  1. #1
    Registered User Nutshell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    1,020

    Linux has many components, windows is all-in-one?

    Hi,

    You know how Linux is made up of many bits and componets combined together to make it a full operating system. Such items include for example, file managers, window managers, GUI environments....shell prompt...etc

    But windows has it all-in-one.

    Am i getting this idea right?

  2. #2
    Registered User mfc2themax's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    346
    it depends on what you mean by "all in one"
    mfc2themax-Creator of all that is.

  3. #3
    Registered User Nutshell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    1,020
    I mean things are not as seperate as they are in Linux.

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    88
    Yes, windows is not modular.

    But it is not all in one, because Linux has more packages than windows contains.

    What is the meaning behind this question?
    Hope you don't mind my bad english, I'm Austrian!

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    2,220
    He's trying to find a flaw in Linux, so he can get a gold star from Microsoft.

  6. #6
    Just one more wrong move. -KEN-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    3,230
    I'm not quite sure, but I guess windows has a monolithic kernel and linux has a microkernel...big whoop. Doesn't mean anything about the OS.

  7. #7
    ....
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Groningen (NL)
    Posts
    2,386
    A full operating system? According to your list of components, I guess you don't know what an operating system really is. Don't you like modular software? I think the reason that Windows has so much problems is that it isn't modular.

  8. #8
    geek SilentStrike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    1,141
    Linux is monolithic as well in terms of kernel design. He was more referring to the application level, where you have pretty much one of everything in windows (one type of command line shell, one window manager intergrated with the OS, etc). More of an observation than a flaw.
    Prove you can code in C++ or C# at TopCoder, referrer rrenaud
    Read my livejournal

  9. #9
    Just one more wrong move. -KEN-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    3,230
    >>I guess you don't know what an operating system really is

    You're right, I'm programming in the dark here...my OS is a random smattering of things that I'm going to label an OS and see if people notice. Perceptive! See, all of those components will be built into the OS...not spread apart.

    >>Don't you like modular software?

    I really don't care either way...why would I? Maybe a support file here and three is a good thing, but making each part modular is kinda overdoing it.

    >>Linux is monolithic

    Now that I think about it, I read an old UseNet thing once where linus torvalds said that himself...

  10. #10
    Registered User Nutshell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    1,020
    Thnx

    Yes my queestion is more of an observation and i just want to make sure that my idea is right. And i agree that there are much more apps or 'packages' in linux than in windows. But i still like the GUI of winxp, nothing can beat it at the moment except osX

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    2,220
    Originally posted by Nutshell
    Thnx

    Yes my queestion is more of an observation and i just want to make sure that my idea is right. And i agree that there are much more apps or 'packages' in linux than in windows. But i still like the GUI of winxp, nothing can beat it at the moment except osX
    Yeah Microsoft haven't quite finished copying osX

  12. #12
    Registered User Nutshell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    1,020
    Wasn't winxp released first?

  13. #13
    geek SilentStrike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    1,141
    I dunno.. I think this GUI is pretty visually appealing.

    http://www.geocities.com/rpgnmets/cap.html
    Prove you can code in C++ or C# at TopCoder, referrer rrenaud
    Read my livejournal

Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. windows .dll vs. linux .so - global static objects
    By pheres in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 11-23-2010, 01:29 PM
  2. Thinking of upgrading to linux...
    By Yarin in forum General Discussions
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 07-24-2009, 12:40 PM
  3. Script errors - bool unrecognized and struct issues
    By ulillillia in forum Windows Programming
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 12-18-2006, 04:44 AM
  4. Why can't Windows run Linux binary executables?
    By Kleid-0 in forum Tech Board
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 12-04-2005, 11:44 PM
  5. Linux and Windows Duel Boot
    By The15th in forum A Brief History of Cprogramming.com
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-26-2002, 05:59 AM

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21