1,shoot your source code in to her
2,wait 9 months to compile
3,exe baby is ready
4,execute life
if the compiler crashs , she just had a abortion
if she dies you know you got aids
if the compiler gives a error , it means she had a mis carriage
woot
Printable View
1,shoot your source code in to her
2,wait 9 months to compile
3,exe baby is ready
4,execute life
if the compiler crashs , she just had a abortion
if she dies you know you got aids
if the compiler gives a error , it means she had a mis carriage
woot
Awesome?
By that description: If only compilers had curves.
>> programming is like sex
Come now, that's very tacky (no pun intended).
>>programming is like sex
..You're doing it wrong.
You're doing which wrong?Quote:
Originally Posted by psychopath
(I suppose the answer is, "Both.")
The answer is lurk moar.
whats sex?
"Just two lonely people being lonely together."
If sex is like two people being lonely together then the only way it's like programming is if the programmer is schizophrenic. You guys are confusing (and I hate you all just fyi).
That reminds me of a rhyme I saw on a movie:
"Roses are red.
Violets are blue.
I'm schizophrenic.
And so am I!"
Not funny.
The only humorous thing about this thread is a few of the posts ;).
Also we all know there's only one software package that takes 9 months to compile... KDE of course.
I thought you were referring to OpenOffice 3 :)Quote:
Originally Posted by zacs7
>> programming is like sex
That's what she said ... ?
As a person who finds things funny, this is not funny. And I don't mean not funny in an offensive way, just not funny.
Okay fine, since we're being honest... I didn't find this funny at all (just so you know!), In fact I found it a bit rude towards women and life (ie abortion), and my Mum is a woman so that makes it personal :-)
Continuing with the honesty... Hasn't anyone told you indigo0086 that it's considered "noobish" to have numbers in your name ;)
Just cause his number's bigger than yours...
Programming is like sex ...
1. You get better with age
2. Your techniques get called old fashioned, even though they work
3. Your code gets bigger and uglier as time goes by.
4. When you are young, it only takes you a few minutes to finish, after a few decades it can take O(n^2) time
5. Most people don't like to be watched while they code, but some do.
6. There are millions of self appointed experts, none of which are any good at coding.
7. The professionals may look appealing, but the hobbyists usually make the most significant breakthroughs.
8. The best programmers aren't easy to look at.
9. Bigger isn't necessarily better.
10. You can do it by yourself, with a partner, or in a large group.
11. Some people are good enough to make money doing it.
This one manages to be funny without being explicit or degrading -- bravo.Quote:
Originally Posted by abachler
Fixed! I find old people a tad creepy. Some of them walk like zombies. I don't want to think about what they do in their free time.Quote:
1. You get better with practice.
We practice being creepy, sometimes we even make bets on who can creep out the most youngun's or take the longest to buy one item at Walmart :) My personal favorite is called 'who can guess the smell' where you put something wierd on your clothes then go to the store and see how many people stare. My high score so far is a combination of campfire and ambergrisQuote:
Originally Posted by whiteflags
Where the heck did you get ambergris, and what were you doing with it while camping? ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by abachler
A better question would be, how did I light a fire in a whales stomach....Quote:
Originally Posted by brewbuck
If programming is like sex, then I feel sorry for the reverse engineer.
What about protected sex? Is that like compiling without actually generating an executable?