Visual Image Link Patent

This is a discussion on Visual Image Link Patent within the A Brief History of Cprogramming.com forums, part of the Community Boards category; I just read about this in a local newspaper today, and wondered what you guys think about it: Singapore firm ...

  1. #1
    C++ Witch laserlight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    20,973

    Visual Image Link Patent

    I just read about this in a local newspaper today, and wondered what you guys think about it: Singapore firm claims patent to image search.

    Dubbing itself "pioneers of visual search technology", Vuestar Technologies said it owns the patent to the technology that enables "Internet searching via visual images".

    In sum, the company implied that any Web site that uses pictures and graphics to link to another site or Web page will need a license from Vuestar.

    "Those who use visual images which hyperlink to other Web pages or Web sites...whether on the first page or subsequent pages of a Web site require a Vuestar 'license of use'," the company said on its site.
    If the reports are accurate, it seems that this is yet another example of a brain damaged software patent that points to the systemic flaws of software patenting.
    C + C++ Compiler: MinGW port of GCC
    Version Control System: Bazaar

    Look up a C++ Reference and learn How To Ask Questions The Smart Way

  2. #2
    Kernel hacker
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Farncombe, Surrey, England
    Posts
    15,677
    But isn't there something called "Prior art" in patent-law - so if someone can prove that a site used visual image links prior to the patent application, the patent is invalid?

    --
    Mats
    Compilers can produce warnings - make the compiler programmers happy: Use them!
    Please don't PM me for help - and no, I don't do help over instant messengers.

  3. #3
    Ethernal Noob
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    1,901
    Pantent claims are getting ridiculous these days.

  4. #4
    Cat without Hat CornedBee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    8,892
    Well, a search for "Vuestar" in the US patent office gives 0 results, although the article reports a claim that the patent was granted in the US.
    All the buzzt!
    CornedBee

    "There is not now, nor has there ever been, nor will there ever be, any programming language in which it is the least bit difficult to write bad code."
    - Flon's Law

  5. #5
    Kernel hacker
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Farncombe, Surrey, England
    Posts
    15,677
    Quote Originally Posted by CornedBee View Post
    Well, a search for "Vuestar" in the US patent office gives 0 results, although the article reports a claim that the patent was granted in the US.
    I tried searching in the Singapore IP office, but it didn't have a applicant of Vuestar listed either.

    I'd like to see the application - it sounds like there's prior art unless it was granted quite a few years back.

    --
    Mats
    Compilers can produce warnings - make the compiler programmers happy: Use them!
    Please don't PM me for help - and no, I don't do help over instant messengers.

  6. #6
    Kernel hacker
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Farncombe, Surrey, England
    Posts
    15,677
    After visiting vuestar's site, I managed to find the patent itself Here


    Edit: And depending on how you read the text, we can either entirely give up and give all our money to VueStar, or they are in breach by prior art with some other web-databases that I know of.

    Further, any forum software using Avatar's is probably in breach (because it uses a database to store the name/link of the avatar)

    --
    Mats
    Last edited by matsp; 05-27-2008 at 09:55 AM.
    Compilers can produce warnings - make the compiler programmers happy: Use them!
    Please don't PM me for help - and no, I don't do help over instant messengers.

  7. #7
    Ethernal Noob
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    1,901
    Like I said, laying claim to things that naturally come into play over the course of further claiming it an an ART is silly. There should be some theory clause in these patent laws to lay the foundations for things that are unique IPs and creations and those that are the foundations for other unique IPs and creations.

  8. #8
    Cat without Hat CornedBee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    8,892
    Well, the FAQ of their website is completely unintelligible.

    Their license is interesting. There are various parts that would be quite illegal here in Austria, for example, the clause that by simply using the technology they claim to have patented, I've entered the license agreement with them. This is not possible under Austrian law.

    I've also read this interesting patent. If the Singapore version is identical to the US version, then there is one thing it quite definitely doesn't cover: simply image links. It only covers image links that appear as part of some search results.

    And I'll still be damned if there isn't some prior art. The patent was filed in 2001. I do not believe that there wasn't some company before that that had both images and text in the search results of their product catalog. (And yes, that would be covered by that patent.)


    Anyway, Google's preview of video search results is also in violation, and there's one company that doesn't have to fear legal costs.
    All the buzzt!
    CornedBee

    "There is not now, nor has there ever been, nor will there ever be, any programming language in which it is the least bit difficult to write bad code."
    - Flon's Law

  9. #9
    Ethernal Noob
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Posts
    1,901
    Google probably already owns them and they don't know it yet. Then when they sue they'll go bankrupt.

  10. #10
    Reverse Engineer maxorator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Estonia
    Posts
    2,318
    I wonder who has the hyperlink patent then...
    "The Internet treats censorship as damage and routes around it." - John Gilmore

  11. #11
    (?<!re)tired Mario F.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    7,383
    For instance, a website named Winfiles (which I had as my home page in the early 90s) returned images as part of the search results. Images were being returned along with anchors and text way before 2001 as server side scripting was already a stable technology. Amazon did it, Yahoo did it, barnes & nobles did it, web flower shops did it... and a million other etceteras.

    Vuestar claim is also ridiculous as images being returned from a search engine isn't technology, a technological platform or subject to any other kind of patent. It's a direct result of functionality provided by the programming language (HTML).

    They can squirm all they want but I would gladly fill a law suit if they so much dared look my way. I've been doing it since ASP 1.0. And can prove it.
    The programmer’s wife tells him: “Run to the store and pick up a loaf of bread. If they have eggs, get a dozen.”
    The programmer comes home with 12 loaves of bread.


    Originally Posted by brewbuck:
    Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.

  12. #12
    Devil's Advocate SlyMaelstrom's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Out of scope
    Posts
    4,062
    Quote Originally Posted by Mario F. View Post
    Vuestar claim is also ridiculous as images being returned from a search engine isn't technology, a technological platform or subject to any other kind of patent. It's a direct result of functionality provided by the programming language (HTML)..
    That's a good point. Perhaps I could go ahead and make a patent on functions that return a boolean value as a result of a string comparison or a function that returns a pointer to a character in a substring function. ^_^
    Last edited by SlyMaelstrom; 05-27-2008 at 01:53 PM.
    Sent from my iPad®

Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. using classes
    By krazykrisi in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 11-22-2006, 09:41 AM
  2. Stupid compiler errors
    By ChrisEacrett in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 11-30-2003, 04:44 PM
  3. Using 'if' with char arrays or string objects
    By c++_n00b in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 06-06-2002, 09:04 PM
  4. odd errors from msvc std library files
    By blight2c in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-30-2002, 12:06 AM
  5. <list>
    By Unregistered in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 02-24-2002, 03:07 PM

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21