Respond

This is a discussion on Respond within the A Brief History of Cprogramming.com forums, part of the Community Boards category; Ok Guys First, let me state that am a livid C and assembly programmer. A few months ago, I embarked ...

  1. #1
    Registered User whistlenm1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    124

    Respond

    Ok Guys

    First, let me state that am a livid C and assembly programmer. A few months ago, I embarked on my journey to learn C++. In my quest the following are the conclusions I have
    come to. C++ is everything I have heard it to be, the benefits that C++ offers over C far outways it faults (speed and exe size), and I truly like the new and delete constructs over malloc and free functions. IMHO, C++ is a great language but a better C, maybe.

    OOP surely surpasses the procedural method of programming, so their was a reason for the progression
    of C to C++, but did it go to far. I mean, come on give me a brake as programmers we should program! Operator overloading, function overloading, inline functions, Reference, Execptions and the jury is still out on namespaces, I consider these trinkets! Hell, even in C their are some constructs that I dont bother to use such as unions and enums, programmer
    preference. Think, before we had any of these tools programmers coded as needed.

    My style of programming follows the old addage, KISS - Keep It Simple Stupid. I program in C++, my methology
    is Object oriented if need be, but I think as a c programmer. I am just wondering as programmers do we use enough common sense i.e., programmer preference or are we lead into excepting verbose tools. Finally, I know that I have not spent enough time in my transition to C++ so I leave that to your responses.
    Man's mind once streched by a new idea, never regains its original dimensions
    - Oliver Wendell Holmes

    In other words, if you teach your cat to bark (output) and eat dog food (input) that doesn't make him a dog. It would have to chase cars, chew bones, and have puppies before I'd call it Rover ;-)
    - WaltP

  2. #2
    ....
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Groningen (NL)
    Posts
    2,386
    >I program in C++, my methology is Object oriented if need be, >but I think as a c programmer.

    Why? C++ offers more ease when implementing object oriented designs, so why should you think as a C programmer, whose way is procedural, when programming in C++?

    OOP is nice, implementing such designs makes large systems more maintanable and better extendable. By the way, you can implement object oriented designs also in C or assembly.

Popular pages Recent additions subscribe to a feed

Similar Threads

  1. XP taking about 8 min to boot and 12 to respond
    By VirtualAce in forum Tech Board
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 09-21-2008, 03:15 AM
  2. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 06-27-2008, 04:39 PM
  3. Read a text file and respond
    By Arangol in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-12-2006, 05:37 AM
  4. respond to button
    By algi in forum Windows Programming
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-19-2005, 10:28 PM
  5. server won't respond...
    By Sebastiani in forum C++ Programming
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 10-19-2002, 10:09 PM

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21