Was your sig not like this - (sorry for the lack of color)
? Just thought about it when you mentioned "It annoys me when people have sigs longer than their own post"dev-c++ on win2kpro.
Visit my website.
Was your sig not like this - (sorry for the lack of color)
? Just thought about it when you mentioned "It annoys me when people have sigs longer than their own post"dev-c++ on win2kpro.
Visit my website.
Yes, but more like this:
Visual stinks!dev-c++/visual-c++ on win2kpro.
Visit my website.
You prefer dev? Hmmm. I'm kinda the opposite. I should try out code::blocks to see what that's like. never used it before.
It annoys me when people get annoyed at the most ridiculous things. I have my sig the way I want it, thank you. Besides my sig is as big as small my post will be.Originally Posted by Cool-August
Now, go get annoyed at something else.
Originally Posted by brewbuck:
Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.
>> It annoys me when people get annoyed at the most ridiculous things.
You have no idea how much I agree with you! Well, perhaps you do actually. Sigs are capped at 500 characters (even though with all the color formatting of mine and whatnot, it's 1200. I guess it's only visible ones which count)
> I guess it's only visible ones which count
Don't you even think about it!
Originally Posted by brewbuck:
Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.
>> Don't you even think about it!
Heh, I didn't mean it that way, Mario. just in the sense of [color=beautiful][/color] not counting towards the sig-character-count.
I know. just pulling your sensitive leg
Originally Posted by brewbuck:
Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.
>> Now, go get annoyed at something else.
Your avatar annoys me.
>> You prefer dev? Hmmm. I'm kinda the opposite. I should
>> try out code::blocks to see what that's like. never used it before.
Dev-C++ is a smaller than Visual-C++, but I find it a lot more user friendly. And when you spend most your time on the computer in the compiler, that really counts!
BTW: I noticed you sized your sig down too.
> Your avatar annoys me.
you, you... square!
Originally Posted by brewbuck:
Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.
>> I know. just pulling your sensitive leg
Heh. And after all I've done for you ... I like the change in personalised title, BTW
Yeah, It was very long and hard to read, apparently. I'm gonna make it longer again (MySQL's up'in running in my site now)
>> you, you... square!
that's a cube, Mario, a cube.
hush!
Originally Posted by brewbuck:
Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.
457 Byte count on your sig Mario... according to crimson editor that is.
I like it but don't think it would help since most people that fail to mention compiler will probably fail to read the FAQ much less a profile.
some of us use more than one compiler.
ad esempio, io.