Was your sig not like this - (sorry for the lack of color)
? Just thought about it when you mentioned "It annoys me when people have sigs longer than their own post"dev-c++ on win2kpro.
Visit my website.
Was your sig not like this - (sorry for the lack of color)
? Just thought about it when you mentioned "It annoys me when people have sigs longer than their own post"dev-c++ on win2kpro.
Visit my website.
Yes, but more like this:
Visual stinks!dev-c++/visual-c++ on win2kpro.
Visit my website.
You prefer dev? Hmmm. I'm kinda the opposite. I should try out code::blocks to see what that's like. never used it before.
It annoys me when people get annoyed at the most ridiculous things. I have my sig the way I want it, thank you. Besides my sig is as big as small my post will be.Originally Posted by Cool-August
Now, go get annoyed at something else.
Originally Posted by brewbuck:
Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.
>> It annoys me when people get annoyed at the most ridiculous things.
You have no idea how much I agree with you! Well, perhaps you do actually. Sigs are capped at 500 characters (even though with all the color formatting of mine and whatnot, it's 1200. I guess it's only visible ones which count)
> I guess it's only visible ones which count
Don't you even think about it!
Originally Posted by brewbuck:
Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.
>> Don't you even think about it!
Heh, I didn't mean it that way, Mario. just in the sense of [color=beautiful][/color] not counting towards the sig-character-count.
I know. just pulling your sensitive leg
Originally Posted by brewbuck:
Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.
>> Now, go get annoyed at something else.
Your avatar annoys me.
>> You prefer dev? Hmmm. I'm kinda the opposite. I should
>> try out code::blocks to see what that's like. never used it before.
Dev-C++ is a smaller than Visual-C++, but I find it a lot more user friendly. And when you spend most your time on the computer in the compiler, that really counts!
BTW: I noticed you sized your sig down too.
> Your avatar annoys me.
you, you... square!
Originally Posted by brewbuck:
Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.
>> I know. just pulling your sensitive leg
Heh. And after all I've done for you ...I like the change in personalised title, BTW
Yeah, It was very long and hard to read, apparently. I'm gonna make it longer again (MySQL's up'in running in my site now)
>> you, you... square!
that's a cube, Mario, a cube.
hush!
Originally Posted by brewbuck:
Reimplementing a large system in another language to get a 25% performance boost is nonsense. It would be cheaper to just get a computer which is 25% faster.
457 Byte count on your sig Mario... according to crimson editor that is.
I like it but don't think it would help since most people that fail to mention compiler will probably fail to read the FAQ much less a profile.
some of us use more than one compiler.
ad esempio, io.
