Look at this!
I almost locked the system up after cc1plus.exe maxed the CPU out.
Look at this!
I almost locked the system up after cc1plus.exe maxed the CPU out.
Heh, you'd think they'd use a linked list or something to store their messages.
Is that windows 95?
Oh, and you had to have done that on purpose. C'mon...301 lines is not enough to make so many mistakes the compiler can't tell you what they all are.
To code is divine
I don't think the compiler can't, exactly. I think it's more along the lines of "What's the point?"
All the buzzt!
CornedBee
"There is not now, nor has there ever been, nor will there ever be, any programming language in which it is the least bit difficult to write bad code."
- Flon's Law
I'd have to agree with cornedbee here... I think it's kinda the same as this error:
there's just no point to showing you thousands of error messages, when most people will fix the first few and try to recompile, and keep doing that until they're all gone...Code:test.cpp:3: error: `x' undeclared (first use this function) test.cpp:3: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in.)
Join is in our Unofficial Cprog IRC channel
Server: irc.phoenixradio.org
Channel: #Tech
Team Cprog Folding@Home: Team #43476
Download it Here
Detailed Stats Here
More Detailed Stats
52 Members so far, are YOU a member?
Current team score: 1223226 (ranked 374 of 45152)
The CBoard team is doing better than 99.16% of the other teams
Top 5 Members: Xterria(518175), pianorain(118517), Bennet(64957), JaWiB(55610), alphaoide(44374)
Last Updated on: Wed, 30 Aug, 2006 @ 2:30 PM EDT
Also since some errors could be causing more errors afterwards that wouldnt exist otherwise (e.g. some syntax errors).
Warning: Have doubt in anything I post.
GCC 4.5, Boost 1.40, Code::Blocks 8.02, Ubuntu 9.10 010001000110000101100101