didn't we get rid of segregation?

**FillYourBrain** · 07-31-2003

Originally posted by BMJ
Well your original topic was stupid...

gay school != segregation

I don't think the original topic was stupid at all. It could have been a worthy discussion of the proper use of government funds in addition to just how segregation is defined.

Instead, it has become this.

**ZerOrDie** · 07-31-2003

how about a more interesting question... are people gay because of genetics? and if so then with slow evolution they should fade out seeing as they would not produce offspring...

**FillYourBrain** · 07-31-2003

I think those that believe its genetic see it as a recessive gene thing. So it is passed on as blue eyes are. Thus there are "carriers" for lack of a better word who are not gay.

**BMJ** · 07-31-2003

Oh suuure... gay is genetic defense people are born with, to naturally balance out our population problem

</unseriousness>

**PJYelton** · 07-31-2003

>>Zakk you must be a very BORING person... sex == procreation; pills == unnatural; hippies == bad<<

LOL I can just see it now, Zakk on his first night with his gf - "Hey baby, lets procreate."

But BMJ brings up a good point, if sex is meant for procreation, and pretty much everybody has sex the majority of the time but trying NOT to have children, then that means EVERYONE is unnatural!!! So what the hell is your problem??

**-KEN-** · 07-31-2003

>>are people gay because of genetics? and if so then with slow evolution they should fade out seeing as they would not produce offspring...

Study yourself some genetics, boy.

**ZakkWylde969** · 07-31-2003

Very nice point. They cannot come from genetics in that logic. Kissing is a sign of affection. All species of mammels show signs of affection by their standards. Kissing isn't a life function. It is a mental thing. Does a gay person kissing a woman consiter that sexual and turn him on? No. It is mental not physical.

I'm not really a boring person. I like to have fun but how can I be amazingly fun to be around in a disagreeance? And coming from you I'm glad I wouldn't be your friend. You sound like a prick.

**BMJ** · 07-31-2003

straight sex with a condom is just as bad as gay sex! It's unnatural == no procreation!!!

omg no!

**PJYelton** · 07-31-2003

Oh I see, but sex can't be considered a sign of affection for gay couples?

**ZakkWylde969** · 07-31-2003

No BMJ. Using condoms isn't natural. It's preventing life functions with technology. Not natural. But accepting it is a choise.

Same sex liking each other. Not natural by reproduction laws (if there are any). Prevention of reproduction we can call it. Not natural. Accepted by some and not by others is a choise.

Gay sex is meant to imitate normal sex but with the same sex. So it's sex not affection. There is a line there.

**ZerOrDie** · 07-31-2003

Originally posted by PJYelton
Oh I see, but sex can't be considered a sign of affection for gay couples?

well that would depend on your definition of "sex" since in most cases it is defined as procreation...

**Clyde** · 07-31-2003

Sex is ment for reproduction.

"meant" is irrelevent, hands legs were "meant" for walking, therefore cycling is wrong, fingers weren't "meant" for typing therefore typing is wrong.

Irrelevent.

All of our characteristic evolved for tangible reasons that does not mean there is any reason that we can't exceed them.

Let us talk about what happens in REGULAR sex. You do it until you ejaculate. The semen goes to the eggs and if one makes it then a baby can be born

Really? You don't say.

Sex is in fact made for reproduction

Sex evolved for reproductive purposes yes, and?

Sexual ones do. Put that logic together if you can you arrogant ass

Logic, yes logic, that's an interesting word isn't? Pity you havent got a freaking clue how to use it.

Just because something evolved for a reason does not mean we should never stray outside that particular usuage, in fact if you knew anything at all about evolution you would see that the WHOLE BASIS of biological design involves taking structures used for one things and adapting them for something else. Nothing is fixed stone.

But even disregarding your scientific illiteracy, are you seriously suggesting people should never have sex unless they want to reproduce? Even when they're married, even when they aren't using contraception.

So people can have sex like a max of once every 9 months or so, heavens man you're a dope.

Now lets talk about natural

Oh yay, i can't wait.

Natural body stuff to be specific

Oh yes that is HIGHLY specific.

Is it natural to eat?

Is it natural for you to be a complete and utter cretin?

Pills aren't natural

Natural doesn't mean $$$$, computers aren't natural bird-brain but you're using one right now with your body *GASP*.Medicine isn't natural you ingest that (unless you really are that stupid), clothes aren;t natural, almost everything mankind does is by your (stupid and totally irelvent) definition not "natural".

Accepting something not natural is up to an individual.

Accepting anything "natural" or not is up to an individual. What's your point? No? No point? What a suprise.

Hippies as someone mentioned are indiviuals who choose to not accept some non natural things

...... you..... you... what? I mean how can anyone sit down and write such utter trite? Hippies accept NON-natural things? "Hippies" are nature freaks you dolt.